NigOnK

NigOnK — CS2 Stats

76561199767113236[U:1:1806847508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

504Tracked matches37%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,882Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 31 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,882 -11,692 5 Apr28 Aug · 2 days played
14,88226,574peak 26,5745 Apr28 Aug
26,574Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-03-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 11,692 below peak (26,574)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 118 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNigOnKFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,882 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52399Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 4133 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.10
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time642ms+224ms
first ⅓ avg 418ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−17.1%
first ⅓ avg 33.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.38Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 14 Aug
75%Best headshot accuracy · 7–4 · nuke, 31 Mar
242msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 5 Apr
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 39ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS39261367%0.06
infernoC32141844%-0.01
mirageB115645%0.01
ancientD61517%-0.03
anubisD62433%0.01
dust243175%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.07
overpass110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

246Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7439%0.9614.7
Nuke5355%1.0316.6
Ancient4452%1.0215.4
Dust22763%0.9715.1
Anubis2035%0.9013.6
Inferno1573%1.0913.9
Vertigo560%0.7612.0
Cache540%1.4516.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
68.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
597msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
11.88HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0311%15 Sept
nuke9–5-0.0226%13 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0317%12 Sept
inferno7–90.0120%10 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0415%8 Sept
dust213–5-0.0315%7 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0012%6 Sept
inferno1–9-0.1513%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0417%6 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0926%6 Sept
inferno8–80.0324%5 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0213%5 Sept
nuke9–7-0.0026%5 Sept
ancient10–130.0117%5 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0017%4 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0625%4 Sept
nuke8–80.0518%3 Sept
nuke11–130.0216%2 Sept
inferno7–9-0.1013%31 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0619%31 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0519%31 Aug
nuke13–30.0823%30 Aug
anubis13–30.1113%30 Aug
nuke2–9-0.087%29 Aug
nuke1–9-0.149%28 Aug
inferno9–70.0217%28 Aug
nuke9–70.085%28 Aug
nuke7–90.0916%28 Aug
mirage11–130.0026%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0212%28 Aug
inferno9–7-0.117%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0317%27 Aug
nuke13–160.028%26 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1027%25 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0626%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0216%23 Aug
anubis13–7-0.017%22 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0512%21 Aug
inferno8–80.0512%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.049%20 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0111%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0610%16 Aug
inferno9–60.0622%15 Aug
dust216–140.0227%15 Aug
inferno9–00.3850%14 Aug
dust213–80.1224%14 Aug
dust214–16-0.0118%13 Aug
mirage13–40.0721%13 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0433%13 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0550%11 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0816%11 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0823%7 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0638%7 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1327%7 Aug
nuke8–8-0.048%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0710%26 Jul
inferno9–2-0.0313%26 Jul
inferno0–9-0.300%26 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0425%22 Jul
anubis10–130.0117%22 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1329%22 Jul
nuke9–30.088%23 May
inferno8–80.1041%23 May
inferno9–60.1432%23 May
nuke13–10-0.0612%17 Apr
nuke13–80.1412%17 Apr
nuke13–50.1227%17 Apr
mirage12–120.0917%15 Apr
inferno7–9-0.1717%11 Apr
nuke13–110.0532%7 Apr
nuke13–20.1430%7 Apr
nuke13–10.1240%7 Apr
nuke13–60.3230%6 Apr
nuke13–50.0829%6 Apr
nuke13–60.0529%6 Apr
nuke4–13-0.040%6 Apr
inferno9–50.0421%6 Apr
inferno5–9-0.0527%5 Apr
inferno9–30.1120%5 Apr
inferno9–30.0919%5 Apr
poseidon3–9-0.0757%5 Apr
overpass9–20.1527%5 Apr
nuke9–30.1221%5 Apr
inferno9–20.090%5 Apr
inferno9–00.2250%5 Apr
mirage15–150.0922%5 Apr
nuke13–10.1322%5 Apr
nuke13–60.1041%5 Apr
nuke13–50.0837%5 Apr
inferno9–20.0956%5 Apr
nuke13–50.1440%5 Apr
nuke9–10.0662%3 Apr
mirage13–70.0645%2 Apr
nuke13–20.1057%2 Apr
nuke6–130.1257%2 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0232%31 Mar
nuke13–70.0824%31 Mar
nuke13–80.0738%31 Mar
nuke7–40.1175%31 Mar
nuke12–40.1330%31 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →