A1t

A1t — CS2 Stats

76561199656853166[U:1:1696587438]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,916Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,958 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,958 → 1,958
+6Tracked matches · now 3,916
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 73 days played since 16 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
73Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,958
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGA1tFACEITLevel 10 · 1,958 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning37
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateLLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.8
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning3.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time567ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 15 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 7 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · ancient, 14 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2614–1254%-0.01
ancientS2416–867%0.00
nukeS2216–673%-0.00
anubisB115–645%-0.02
infernoD70–70%-0.03
dust2S54–180%-0.02
overpass—31–233%-0.04
cache—20–20%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,837Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.5ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient106457%1.0115.8
Mirage82945%0.9414.3
Anubis59948%0.9515.2
Nuke56953%0.9814.7
Train20755%1.1416.1
Inferno20642%0.9114.4
Dust216038%0.8313.8
Overpass10448%0.9014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
568msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
32.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
12.1%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
7.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.5839% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0914%24 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0321%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0544%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0417%19 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0721%18 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0221%15 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0123%12 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0414%11 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0620%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.0417%6 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0416%6 Sept →
anubis15–19-0.0216%1 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0530%31 Aug →
dust213–80.0326%31 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0212%31 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0529%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0238%30 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0029%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0124%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0329%20 Aug →
nuke13–80.0123%17 Aug →
mirage13–10.0417%14 Aug →
ancient11–130.0020%14 Aug →
ancient13–10.1114%14 Aug →
dust222–20-0.0117%11 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0118%10 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0614%10 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0115%7 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0518%5 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0620%4 Aug →
nuke13–100.0626%3 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0448%30 Jul →
mirage22–25-0.0225%30 Jul →
ancient13–90.0115%27 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0328%26 Jul →
ancient13–90.0226%25 Jul →
cache10–130.0426%25 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0335%24 Jul →
mirage13–80.0728%20 Jul →
ancient13–90.0319%17 Jul →
nuke13–00.1220%15 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0211%13 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0114%13 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0416%12 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0615%10 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0220%5 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0120%2 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0412%1 Jul →
nuke13–90.0023%24 Jun →
ancient4–130.0135%23 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0324%20 Jun →
nuke13–70.0220%19 Jun →
ancient13–00.0342%17 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0121%17 Jun →
nuke13–100.0226%16 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.0314%16 Jun →
mirage10–130.0224%15 Jun →
ancient11–130.0224%15 Jun →
nuke13–60.0733%15 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0232%14 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0520%14 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0118%13 Jun →
mirage18–22-0.0325%13 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0821%11 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0527%10 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0423%9 Jun →
nuke13–70.0721%8 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0031%8 Jun →
anubis12–120.0542%7 Jun →
mirage13–30.0138%7 Jun →
mirage13–70.0536%6 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0619%5 Jun →
nuke7–130.0132%5 Jun →
ancient3–130.0136%4 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0019%2 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0326%30 May →
ancient13–110.0021%23 May →
inferno14–160.0028%18 May →
nuke13–100.0335%17 May →
mirage7–130.0134%17 May →
nuke13–11-0.0240%15 May →
overpass13–10-0.0217%14 May →
ancient13–10-0.0222%14 May →
ancient9–13-0.0423%10 May →
mirage13–110.0325%10 May →
ancient3–13-0.0024%8 May →
nuke3–13-0.0750%7 May →
nuke13–11-0.0315%2 May →
ancient13–10-0.0315%29 Apr →
ancient13–90.0622%27 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0330%27 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0327%26 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0022%26 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0223%26 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0333%26 Apr →
ancient13–60.0020%22 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0016%20 Apr →
mirage13–110.0531%18 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0410%17 Apr →
ancient5–130.0524%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →