WiggyM8 — CS2 Stats

76561199596906322[U:1:1636640594]✓ No bans

1,828Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,788Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4543 of 21575 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWiggyM8FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,788 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning44
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5644Last 10056%Win rateWWWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression4.4
Utility6.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time634ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 6mirageWeakest map · 47% over 36
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36171947%0.01
dust2B24121250%-0.01
cacheS107370%0.02
nukeA95456%0.00
anubisA85363%-0.00
infernoA74357%-0.02
ancientS660100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 36). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
36%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
89.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40%0.8414.5
Vertigo450%0.9820.0
Anubis20%1.0214.0
Inferno250%0.8910.0
Dust21100%0.829.0
Ancient1100%1.338.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.3%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
637msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
10.85HE damage / grenade
10.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.8661% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 36 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0423%28 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0213%28 Aug
cache13–10.0319%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0614%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0434%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.0718%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0025%28 Aug
dust213–20.1015%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0610%27 Aug
cache13–20.1429%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0526%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0621%27 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0223%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0429%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0014%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0827%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0456%20 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0829%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0519%20 Aug
mirage13–70.0432%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0426%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0814%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0323%18 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0629%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0422%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0443%16 Aug
cache13–00.0431%16 Aug
mirage13–60.1830%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0220%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0928%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.038%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0729%14 Aug
dust213–6-0.0117%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0921%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.058%14 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0522%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0514%10 Aug
cache13–50.0323%10 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0617%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0022%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0324%10 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0227%10 Aug
dust213–70.0119%10 Aug
nuke13–100.0241%10 Aug
dust21–13-0.0336%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0316%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0646%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0519%8 Aug
cache13–80.0234%8 Aug
mirage9–130.0123%6 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0418%6 Aug
dust21–2-0.0550%6 Aug
cache13–50.0428%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0213%6 Aug
mirage9–130.0429%6 Aug
dust22–13-0.0624%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0317%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0321%5 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0315%5 Aug
nuke6–130.0230%3 Aug
dust213–16-0.0325%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0220%2 Aug
dust211–130.0120%2 Aug
mirage13–100.1011%2 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0519%2 Aug
dust213–80.0513%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.1112%23 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0229%23 Jul
nuke5–130.0224%23 Jul
mirage13–100.0928%23 Jul
ancient13–100.0525%23 Jul
mirage13–60.1421%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0238%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0226%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.0328%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0426%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0336%22 Jul
dust213–40.1025%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0418%22 Jul
cache13–9-0.0619%22 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0330%22 Jul
nuke13–30.0233%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0317%22 Jul
cache6–13-0.0018%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0733%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0322%22 Jul
dust213–50.1010%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0112%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0528%21 Jul
nuke13–50.0527%21 Jul
anubis10–130.0118%21 Jul
dust216–130.0119%21 Jul
mirage7–130.0117%21 Jul
dust216–130.0130%21 Jul
anubis13–10.1130%21 Jul
inferno13–90.0119%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0329%21 Jul
mirage13–160.0119%21 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0231%21 Jul
cache8–13-0.0522%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →