✪snalm

✪snalm — CS2 Stats

BB76561199588479870[U:1:1628214142]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,854Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,927Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#76651 of 225460 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,573 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,854 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 16 days played since 4 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,927 -502 4 Aug15 Sept · 18 days played
15,41221,663peak 21,6634 Aug15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,573 +0 13 Sept15 Sept · 2 observations
1,5731,573peak 1,57313 Sept15 Sept
21,663Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,573Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-08-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,573
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 178 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,736 below peak (21,663)
  • +2,119 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 73 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪snalmFACEITLevel 8 · 1,573 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,927 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,573csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning57
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateWLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time596ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy28.5%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 9 Sept
58%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 30 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 13 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%0.02
cacheS1711665%0.02
ancientS1712571%0.02
nukeA148657%0.03
anubisB105550%0.01
dust2A95456%-0.03
infernoD81713%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

306Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
85.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8954%1.0817.2
Inferno5355%1.2017.7
Ancient4749%1.1718.1
Anubis3954%1.1117.7
Nuke3145%1.3716.9
Dust22646%1.0515.3
Train1050%1.3419.3
Overpass475%1.4221.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.8%Headshot accuracy
42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.8%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
593msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.45HE damage / grenade
8.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3304% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0732%10 Sept
mirage6–130.0847%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0448%10 Sept
mirage7–130.0013%10 Sept
ancient13–60.0623%10 Sept
ancient16–140.0130%10 Sept
ancient0–5-0.0429%9 Sept
mirage13–110.1123%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0125%9 Sept
mirage13–30.1636%9 Sept
mirage9–130.0125%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0212%9 Sept
nuke16–140.0327%9 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0328%9 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0129%9 Sept
cache7–130.0530%9 Sept
nuke13–40.0417%4 Sept
anubis13–110.0133%4 Sept
cache13–20.0041%4 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0335%4 Sept
anubis4–30.0422%4 Sept
cache13–90.0234%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0333%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0123%3 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0328%3 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0129%3 Sept
cache16–13-0.0038%3 Sept
inferno13–100.0133%3 Sept
anubis13–40.0617%3 Sept
dust213–7-0.0427%3 Sept
inferno7–130.0024%3 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0526%3 Sept
nuke14–160.0626%3 Sept
dust23–13-0.0725%3 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0329%3 Sept
cache13–70.0116%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0237%2 Sept
nuke13–100.0934%2 Sept
mirage13–00.1128%2 Sept
mirage13–100.0228%2 Sept
inferno3–13-0.100%1 Sept
ancient4–130.0428%1 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0124%1 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0426%1 Sept
cache13–60.0125%1 Sept
ancient13–20.0724%1 Sept
mirage5–13-0.070%31 Aug
cache3–13-0.0923%31 Aug
ancient13–90.0145%31 Aug
dust213–10-0.0143%31 Aug
cache13–80.0823%31 Aug
ancient13–40.1123%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0125%31 Aug
inferno10–130.0626%31 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0730%31 Aug
dust213–7-0.0732%31 Aug
dust213–80.1132%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0241%30 Aug
inferno8–130.0058%30 Aug
anubis0–5-0.0340%14 Aug
nuke16–130.0129%14 Aug
cache13–110.0533%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0527%14 Aug
cache13–60.0638%14 Aug
nuke13–20.0132%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0020%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0130%12 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0427%12 Aug
mirage13–30.0426%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.1140%12 Aug
cache8–130.0421%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0831%12 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0231%12 Aug
nuke3–130.0333%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0442%12 Aug
cache4–5-0.0415%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0531%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.0225%11 Aug
ancient13–100.0628%11 Aug
dust28–130.0323%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0136%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0425%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0126%6 Aug
ancient9–130.0721%6 Aug
mirage13–30.0328%6 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0238%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0625%5 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0223%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0422%5 Aug
cache13–40.0427%5 Aug
nuke5–130.0135%5 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0638%5 Aug
cache5–130.0623%5 Aug
cache13–60.0222%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0326%5 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0124%5 Aug
nuke13–80.1125%5 Aug
mirage7–130.0333%5 Aug
mirage15–150.0527%4 Aug
anubis13–10.1124%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →