DrGalaxya

DrGalaxya — CS2 Stats

VI76561199545657343[U:1:1585391615]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,616Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating20,163Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19255 of 51891 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 893 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrGalaxyaFACEITLevel 3 · 893 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,163 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning34
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD464212Last 10046%Win rateWLLLWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression3.2
Utility5.8
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning3.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time590ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — nuke 13–6
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 42infernoWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB42222052%-0.02
infernoD2171433%-0.03
dust2C114736%-0.02
cacheC73443%-0.02
ancientB63350%-0.03
nukeB63350%-0.01
anubis31233%-0.05
vertigo32167%0.02
train110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches
51%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
71.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5048%0.8111.7
Dust23348%0.8013.6
Inferno2250%0.8813.1
Anubis2250%0.8915.6
Ancient1450%0.7612.4
Nuke1362%1.0716.9
Vertigo650%0.9411.3
Train2100%0.7812.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
26.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
597msReaction time
18.6%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
10.73HE damage / grenade
11.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.5612% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–8-0.0038%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.075%30 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0115%30 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0114%30 Aug
inferno9–70.0624%30 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0215%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.019%29 Aug
dust210–130.0016%29 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0214%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0713%29 Aug
mirage13–20.0523%29 Aug
inferno1–9-0.299%29 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0320%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.090%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.1017%28 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0416%28 Aug
ancient13–100.0523%28 Aug
inferno5–90.0522%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.1420%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0423%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0410%27 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0425%27 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0515%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0215%25 Aug
dust216–13-0.0318%25 Aug
nuke13–30.0432%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0726%25 Aug
dust213–60.0724%25 Aug
ancient13–30.0623%25 Aug
inferno4–9-0.138%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0214%25 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0620%25 Aug
dust211–130.0316%25 Aug
dust213–3-0.047%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0817%25 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0018%24 Aug
dust213–110.0229%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.1110%24 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0632%24 Aug
inferno8–8-0.067%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0717%24 Aug
inferno13–60.0729%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0426%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0633%24 Aug
cache0–13-0.0913%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0424%24 Aug
nuke13–60.1216%24 Aug
mirage13–30.0843%24 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0211%24 Aug
nuke2–9-0.0929%24 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0121%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0114%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0711%22 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0811%22 Aug
mirage13–110.0718%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0220%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0215%21 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0120%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0228%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0232%21 Aug
inferno3–9-0.2342%21 Aug
mirage13–60.0316%21 Aug
cache12–120.0130%21 Aug
cache16–13-0.0319%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0422%21 Aug
cache7–13-0.009%21 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1715%21 Aug
inferno9–40.0721%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0418%21 Aug
cache13–80.0420%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0213%20 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0220%20 Aug
inferno9–30.1130%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0523%20 Aug
mirage13–50.0528%20 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0536%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0618%20 Aug
mirage13–30.079%19 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0516%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.024%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.1019%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0316%19 Aug
mirage12–120.0130%19 Aug
mirage13–50.0119%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0619%19 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0725%19 Aug
inferno8–80.0623%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0721%18 Aug
inferno8–8-0.046%18 Aug
cache10–13-0.0421%17 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0418%17 Aug
vertigo9–10.0930%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0520%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0120%16 Aug
cache13–6-0.0226%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0313%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0421%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0811%16 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0515%15 Aug
mirage10–2-0.0019%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →