00000000001

00000000001 — CS2 Stats

UZ76561199541502838[U:1:1581237110]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,665Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,584Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32860 of 225461 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,954 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 4 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,584 +1,916 3 Aug13 Sept · 16 days played
21,56524,068peak 24,0683 Aug13 Sept
24,068Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,954Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,954
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 47 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 484 below peak (24,068)
  • +749 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,416 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG00000000001FACEITLevel 9 · 1,954 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,584 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,954csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning64
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWLWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.1pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time554ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 6–13 · mirage, 15 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 29 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 23 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
414In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC40172343%-0.01
dust2C1981142%-0.02
ancientS1510567%0.01
anubisD103730%0.02
nukeC73443%-0.02
infernoD61517%-0.00
cache31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,975Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
79.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70950%1.0415.8
Dust244751%1.0415.7
Ancient31053%1.0716.4
Anubis21849%1.0715.9
Inferno11346%1.0215.2
Nuke8343%1.0216.1
Train3444%1.1415.9
Overpass2843%1.0618.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
545msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
10.44HE damage / grenade
9.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6583% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.1314%17 Sept
mirage6–130.1824%15 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0717%15 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0126%15 Sept
mirage11–20.0011%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0316%13 Sept
nuke13–160.0325%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0019%13 Sept
ancient13–100.0417%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0524%12 Sept
dust24–13-0.059%6 Sept
anubis8–130.0410%5 Sept
anubis4–130.019%5 Sept
nuke2–8-0.0411%5 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0619%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0123%31 Aug
cache13–90.0014%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0211%30 Aug
nuke16–140.0310%30 Aug
inferno13–100.0117%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0518%29 Aug
dust214–16-0.0113%28 Aug
ancient13–30.0623%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0229%23 Aug
mirage8–130.0619%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0426%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0514%21 Aug
dust216–12-0.057%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0315%21 Aug
mirage13–60.008%20 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0710%17 Aug
ancient23–250.018%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.059%16 Aug
dust22–13-0.0721%16 Aug
anubis13–30.1514%16 Aug
dust213–70.0617%16 Aug
mirage17–19-0.0211%15 Aug
dust213–90.0723%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0330%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0423%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0110%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0113%12 Aug
dust213–80.0122%11 Aug
ancient13–30.0316%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0010%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0220%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.098%6 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0314%5 Aug
dust213–90.0224%3 Aug
ancient16–140.0114%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0520%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.086%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.043%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0729%2 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0314%2 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0710%2 Aug
anubis13–20.1311%2 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0023%2 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0111%1 Aug
mirage13–40.0717%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0320%1 Aug
mirage9–130.0325%1 Aug
mirage13–70.0010%1 Aug
dust213–9-0.0111%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0012%31 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0413%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0121%30 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0119%30 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0516%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0113%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0513%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0625%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.044%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0710%29 Jul
mirage13–20.0440%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0012%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.080%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0119%29 Jul
mirage13–30.0614%29 Jul
dust213–80.0619%29 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0419%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0813%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0418%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0413%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.060%26 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0312%26 Jul
dust21–6-0.100%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0313%26 Jul
anubis13–80.0719%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0611%23 Jul
cache4–13-0.0813%23 Jul
dust213–40.0216%20 Jul
ancient13–30.1018%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0427%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0525%17 Jul
dust210–13-0.0315%6 Jul
mirage5–13-0.088%5 Jul
mirage13–30.0613%5 Jul
cache11–13-0.039%5 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0419%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →