hakuna matata

hakuna matata — CS2 Stats

US76561199537026379[U:1:1576760651]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,200Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,441Purple band · top ~26.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,098 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 15,441 → 15,441
0Faceit ELO · 1,098 → 1,098
+30Tracked matches · now 1,200
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 13 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,441 -185 17 Jun5 Sept · 12 days played
14,50615,626peak 15,62617 Jun5 Sept
15,692Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,098Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,098
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 185 below peak (15,626)
  • +563 over 30 days · improving
  • -185 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,559 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhakuna matataFACEITLevel 5 · 1,098 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,441 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,098csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning49
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45541Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time574ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 18 Jun
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 11 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 14 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 3 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
29In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2391439%-0.01
infernoA2213959%-0.01
ancientC1871139%-0.02
cacheB137654%-0.02
nukeD134931%-0.02
anubisS75271%0.01
dust24040%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

603Matches
49%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
70.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21747%0.8813.6
Ancient12053%0.8513.7
Inferno11248%0.8212.9
Nuke7446%0.8412.9
Dust23053%0.8612.9
Anubis2148%1.0415.5
Overpass956%0.7212.2
Vertigo862%0.8614.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
570msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
9.29HE damage / grenade
6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5381% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0521%16 Sept
mirage9–130.0420%12 Sept
cache10–130.0411%10 Sept
dust25–130.0125%10 Sept
inferno13–50.0016%10 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0219%9 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0317%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0113%8 Sept
inferno13–90.0613%4 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0421%2 Sept
cache13–70.0018%29 Aug
cache13–50.0714%29 Aug
inferno7–13-0.039%26 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0021%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0224%26 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0110%25 Aug
mirage13–90.0217%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0419%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0122%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0518%25 Aug
cache11–13-0.0815%23 Aug
anubis14–160.089%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0415%23 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0114%21 Aug
inferno13–80.0615%19 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0112%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0018%18 Aug
inferno15–19-0.0315%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0418%14 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0115%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0213%13 Aug
ancient13–40.0216%12 Aug
inferno16–130.037%11 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1544%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0032%7 Aug
nuke10–130.0026%4 Aug
ancient11–130.0116%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0929%31 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0412%30 Jul
nuke3–13-0.1117%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0211%28 Jul
inferno13–100.0514%25 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0319%24 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0111%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0418%22 Jul
inferno13–50.0023%16 Jul
cache16–14-0.058%16 Jul
mirage13–20.0114%16 Jul
mirage11–7-0.017%16 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0017%16 Jul
cache13–30.0117%15 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0613%15 Jul
inferno13–50.0120%15 Jul
dust22–130.0214%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0612%13 Jul
cache9–130.0013%12 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0615%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0328%10 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0120%9 Jul
nuke10–130.0216%9 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0323%9 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0125%9 Jul
cache1–13-0.154%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0715%9 Jul
nuke13–80.0012%8 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0017%8 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0713%7 Jul
anubis13–30.0115%7 Jul
cache7–13-0.0122%7 Jul
cache13–10-0.0621%7 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0125%7 Jul
cache13–20.0327%3 Jul
cache13–1-0.0415%3 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0314%3 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0811%1 Jul
mirage13–160.0110%1 Jul
inferno16–120.069%30 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0315%27 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0017%26 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0614%24 Jun
dust28–13-0.0420%23 Jun
mirage13–30.0727%23 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0310%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0121%23 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0117%23 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0315%22 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0215%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0617%22 Jun
nuke13–100.0115%22 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0013%22 Jun
mirage10–130.0119%20 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0121%18 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0224%18 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0320%18 Jun
anubis13–30.0918%18 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0027%17 Jun
nuke7–13-0.1030%16 Jun
ancient6–13-0.038%16 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0412%13 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0519%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →