rotten — CS2 Stats

76561199508121382[U:1:1547855654]

1,037Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,457Pink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5389 of 12628 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,457Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,457
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,543 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrottenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,457 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning52
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT6733Last 10067%Win rateWLWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression4.3
Utility3.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — mirage 13–2
130Biggest win — cache
11Longest win streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 57% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A34211362%0.01
mirageS30201067%0.03
ancientS139469%-0.00
anubisA74357%0.02
infernoS65183%0.06
nukeA53260%0.00
cacheS550100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

390Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12151%1.0415.8
Dust27847%1.0116.0
Ancient7056%1.1416.4
Anubis2945%1.1715.6
Inferno2658%1.1918.8
Nuke2548%0.9715.8
Vertigo2454%1.1516.9
Cache1331%0.9014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
563msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
31.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
4.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0417%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0333%27 Aug
dust213–50.0825%26 Aug
mirage13–80.1018%26 Aug
dust29–130.0116%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0322%25 Aug
dust24–130.0222%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0525%25 Aug
dust213–70.0323%25 Aug
dust213–8-0.0514%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0618%25 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0216%24 Aug
dust219–17-0.0022%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0129%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.0625%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0921%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0124%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0037%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0317%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0415%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0416%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0917%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0120%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0113%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0422%14 Aug
mirage13–50.0120%14 Aug
dust213–110.020%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.0433%13 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0711%13 Aug
cache16–13-0.0431%13 Aug
dust222–180.0022%12 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1016%10 Aug
dust216–130.0424%8 Aug
dust213–5-0.0345%8 Aug
anubis3–11-0.0435%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0121%6 Aug
inferno13–100.0725%6 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0313%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0628%6 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0221%4 Aug
dust213–110.0120%4 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0518%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0426%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0429%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.1217%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0014%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0629%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0226%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0321%2 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0123%2 Aug
dust213–16-0.0817%1 Aug
anubis13–90.0519%31 Jul
ancient13–110.0227%31 Jul
dust27–1-0.027%31 Jul
cache13–00.0267%24 Jul
dust213–10.1314%24 Jul
inferno7–10.0142%24 Jul
cache13–00.0189%24 Jul
mirage6–0-0.010%24 Jul
dust20–13-0.0544%24 Jul
mirage13–110.2148%24 Jul
mirage13–20.2828%24 Jul
inferno13–50.1626%24 Jul
inferno10–30.1050%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0831%23 Jul
dust213–60.2542%23 Jul
dust213–100.1937%23 Jul
nuke13–60.0434%23 Jul
dust213–11-0.0118%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0726%23 Jul
dust214–160.0734%22 Jul
inferno13–30.0614%22 Jul
nuke13–100.1235%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.048%22 Jul
mirage8–130.0518%21 Jul
nuke16–19-0.0416%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0816%20 Jul
dust211–13-0.0420%20 Jul
dust28–130.0541%20 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0114%20 Jul
dust27–130.0229%20 Jul
anubis13–110.0721%20 Jul
dust213–100.0125%20 Jul
dust213–110.0123%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0928%20 Jul
dust213–40.0722%20 Jul
mirage16–140.0330%20 Jul
ancient13–100.0626%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0512%19 Jul
mirage13–10.0045%19 Jul
cache13–30.1032%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0423%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0329%19 Jul
ancient13–40.0113%19 Jul
dust213–9-0.0319%19 Jul
dust213–50.0454%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.0323%19 Jul
cache13–50.0610%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0513%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0913%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →