crackson

crackson — CS2 Stats

76561199478668459[U:1:1518402731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

832Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80667 of 251930 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,142 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +866 3 Aug – 9 Oct · 29 days played
18,45520,501peak 20,5013 Aug9 Oct
20,501Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,142
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 501 below peak (20,501)
  • +18 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcracksonFACEITLevel 8 · 1,142 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility5.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time504ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 6 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · cache, 30 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · anubis, 9 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2514–1156%0.01
cacheA2212–1055%0.01
nukeS1711–665%0.03
ancientC166–1038%-0.00
anubisD103–730%0.01
infernoS66–0100%0.01
dust2—42–250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

238Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4858%1.0714.7
Ancient4547%1.0917.4
Nuke3060%1.2116.8
Anubis2458%1.1715.2
Inferno2148%0.9414.1
Vertigo2040%1.0716.2
Cache1392%1.5019.5
Overpass850%0.8711.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
495msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
6.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.461% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.026%9 Oct →
anubis13–160.027%9 Oct →
nuke13–80.1318%9 Oct →
cache13–70.1219%8 Oct →
mirage14–160.0321%8 Oct →
anubis13–60.087%8 Oct →
cache5–130.0415%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.1221%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.0412%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0414%7 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.009%13 Sept →
cache2–13-0.015%13 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0314%13 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0515%13 Sept →
ancient13–110.0118%12 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0817%11 Sept →
cache8–130.0111%11 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0614%11 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.027%11 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0316%11 Sept →
cache10–13-0.059%11 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0612%10 Sept →
ancient13–50.0412%10 Sept →
nuke10–130.0212%7 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.034%7 Sept →
mirage16–140.0018%7 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0213%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0712%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.017%7 Sept →
cache13–50.0714%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0211%6 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.044%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.008%6 Sept →
nuke13–100.1415%6 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0319%5 Sept →
mirage11–130.0610%2 Sept →
inferno13–30.0419%2 Sept →
ancient2–130.025%2 Sept →
nuke13–40.0119%1 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0117%1 Sept →
ancient13–50.0619%1 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.050%1 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0115%1 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.059%31 Aug →
cache6–130.0218%31 Aug →
nuke6–130.0215%31 Aug →
anubis5–130.0119%30 Aug →
anubis13–100.0212%30 Aug →
mirage13–100.1013%30 Aug →
mirage8–130.0112%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0723%30 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0736%30 Aug →
mirage13–60.0221%29 Aug →
cache13–10-0.018%29 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0210%28 Aug →
cache8–130.0316%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0419%27 Aug →
ancient9–130.028%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0822%24 Aug →
nuke13–30.1122%24 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0216%24 Aug →
mirage6–130.0010%24 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0310%23 Aug →
nuke19–170.0012%23 Aug →
nuke4–130.0418%23 Aug →
mirage13–90.0115%21 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0120%21 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0113%21 Aug →
cache13–11-0.009%15 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0011%15 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.049%15 Aug →
nuke11–130.0413%15 Aug →
mirage13–80.0219%15 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0211%15 Aug →
cache13–70.0310%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0011%12 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0315%12 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0613%11 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0212%11 Aug →
cache13–10.136%11 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0415%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0121%11 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0310%10 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0414%9 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.032%9 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0215%9 Aug →
inferno16–130.0511%8 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0411%8 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0527%8 Aug →
anubis13–90.0810%7 Aug →
mirage13–90.0511%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.025%7 Aug →
nuke13–60.0026%4 Aug →
mirage13–40.031%4 Aug →
inferno16–120.0215%3 Aug →
cache13–110.077%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.0519%3 Aug →
cache13–80.0214%3 Aug →
mirage11–130.0421%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.