Ykäri-Sonni

Ykäri-Sonni — CS2 Stats

SR76561199477614500[U:1:1517348772]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,201Tracked matches33%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,607Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88553 of 252471 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,282 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,607 -1,689 29 Aug – 4 Oct · 5 days played
19,43821,296peak 21,29629 Aug4 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,282 +0 29 Aug – 9 Sept · 3 observations
1,2821,282peak 1,28229 Aug9 Sept
21,296Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,282Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,282
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 69 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,689 below peak (21,296)
  • -1,689 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 393 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYkäri-SonniFACEITLevel 8 · 1,282 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,607 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,282csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning40
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35–49–16Last 10035%Win rateLWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +98ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility3.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.0
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time550ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 8 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–8 · rush_001, 11 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · vertigo, 21 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 24debrisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD3210–2231%0.00
nukeA2414–1058%0.02
vertigoD82–625%-0.01
debrisD61–517%-0.00
mirageD51–420%0.00
ancientC52–340%0.03
poseidonC52–340%0.05
anubis—41–325%0.01
eldorado—30–30%-0.07
overpass—31–233%0.01
cache—21–150%0.02
dust2—20–20%-0.05
rush_001—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

201Matches
55%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5650%0.9514.9
Inferno5157%1.0515.2
Nuke4365%1.2716.8
Ancient3256%1.0917.1
Anubis1145%1.0715.3
Cache540%0.8212.0
Dust230%0.7813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
584msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
3.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3471 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0442% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0612%15 Oct →
nuke13–110.0113%15 Oct →
mirage13–50.0524%15 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0220%13 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.0250%11 Oct →
cache6–130.0330%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0223%11 Oct →
nuke13–20.0329%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.0219%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0518%4 Oct →
nuke1–1-0.030%4 Oct →
inferno10–130.0133%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0221%2 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0120%28 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0526%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0418%28 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0117%27 Sept →
anubis16–140.0214%27 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0030%27 Sept →
nuke13–30.0526%27 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.0513%27 Sept →
inferno7–130.0429%27 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0324%23 Sept →
nuke5–130.0817%23 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0544%22 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.1350%22 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.220%22 Sept →
inferno9–70.0233%22 Sept →
eldorado8–80.0117%22 Sept →
debris7–90.1317%22 Sept →
inferno9–40.1824%22 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0827%22 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.1521%22 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0029%22 Sept →
vertigo8–80.1017%22 Sept →
nuke6–90.0634%22 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0620%22 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0119%17 Sept →
anubis4–130.0610%17 Sept →
cache13–100.0233%17 Sept →
vertigo9–70.1044%10 Sept →
nuke9–20.1917%10 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0319%10 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.1030%9 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0229%9 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.025%9 Sept →
inferno8–80.1026%8 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0525%8 Sept →
nuke9–30.1821%8 Sept →
inferno9–10.3329%8 Sept →
inferno8–80.0617%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0520%7 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0122%7 Sept →
mirage12–120.0324%7 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0322%6 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0428%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.039%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0219%6 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.1320%5 Sept →
inferno9–50.1343%5 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0420%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0536%29 Aug →
ancient8–130.0415%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0518%28 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0219%28 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.0821%26 Aug →
debris6–9-0.0815%26 Aug →
vertigo9–10.1336%26 Aug →
poseidon4–90.0017%26 Aug →
nuke7–9-0.0420%26 Aug →
inferno4–90.0536%26 Aug →
nuke9–50.1325%25 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1429%23 Aug →
debris3–9-0.2227%23 Aug →
nuke9–60.0618%23 Aug →
poseidon9–20.1515%23 Aug →
debris9–50.1029%23 Aug →
nuke9–20.1816%23 Aug →
overpass7–9-0.0222%23 Aug →
nuke9–50.1019%23 Aug →
vertigo7–9-0.0911%23 Aug →
inferno9–60.0433%23 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0442%22 Aug →
poseidon9–20.1647%21 Aug →
debris8–80.0624%21 Aug →
nuke9–70.0723%21 Aug →
overpass8–8-0.1024%21 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0429%21 Aug →
eldorado2–9-0.1222%21 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0214%21 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0320%21 Aug →
debris8–80.0036%21 Aug →
poseidon5–9-0.0527%21 Aug →
overpass9–40.1518%21 Aug →
nuke9–60.0126%21 Aug →
vertigo3–9-0.1520%21 Aug →
inferno8–80.0024%21 Aug →
ancient13–90.0217%20 Aug →
ancient13–160.0917%20 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0914%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.