Emmmm

Emmmm — CS2 Stats

CN76561199426670592[U:1:1466404864]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,385Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,215Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Jun 2026 (98 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,215 +1,054 7 Jun – 26 Jun · 4 days played
17,16118,954peak 18,9547 Jun26 Jun
18,954Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 739 below peak (18,954)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,785 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmmmmFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,215 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning52
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility3.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.2
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time595ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 7 Jun →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 22 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 24 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 8 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 50% over 38
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3819–1950%-0.02
ancientB2613–1350%-0.00
anubisS1510–567%-0.01
infernoA85–363%0.01
dust2S65–183%0.01
nuke—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.05
cache—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 38). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,955Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage53552%0.9815.1
Ancient26351%0.9615.2
Anubis23153%0.9715.3
Vertigo10349%0.9115.3
Inferno8243%0.9014.1
Dust23435%0.8312.7
Nuke3142%0.7912.1
Train1040%0.8213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
595msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
5.62HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.7931% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0316%2 Oct →
mirage6–130.0321%2 Oct →
mirage7–130.0118%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0515%29 Sept →
mirage14–160.0123%28 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0624%26 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0419%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0727%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0016%25 Sept →
ancient13–60.0716%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0413%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0114%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0619%24 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0617%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0117%22 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0322%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0319%22 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0538%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.1119%22 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0410%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0317%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.088%22 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0019%16 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0619%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0824%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0229%15 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0410%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0115%15 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.076%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0117%15 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0133%15 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0214%15 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0320%14 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0116%11 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.100%11 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0719%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.047%11 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0316%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0223%10 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0414%10 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0522%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0212%10 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0314%10 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0518%8 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0520%8 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0032%8 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0013%8 Sept →
anubis13–60.0319%8 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0214%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0128%8 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0332%8 Sept →
mirage7–130.0621%8 Sept →
anubis13–80.0714%7 Sept →
anubis16–19-0.0712%7 Sept →
ancient11–130.0116%7 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0314%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0115%6 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0224%5 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0112%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.0330%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0718%4 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0321%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0120%4 Sept →
mirage13–100.0222%4 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0219%4 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0113%3 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0311%31 Aug →
mirage10–130.0020%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0718%30 Aug →
nuke13–80.0222%30 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0725%30 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0628%30 Aug →
ancient13–80.0326%30 Aug →
mirage13–30.0634%29 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0216%29 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0313%29 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0224%29 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0316%29 Aug →
mirage13–110.0416%28 Aug →
inferno13–60.0524%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0729%28 Jun →
dust213–50.0832%28 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0123%28 Jun →
ancient13–60.0524%28 Jun →
anubis12–120.1032%27 Jun →
vertigo13–100.0528%27 Jun →
inferno9–30.0019%27 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0230%26 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0516%26 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0418%16 Jun →
dust213–100.0325%16 Jun →
anubis13–80.0120%8 Jun →
inferno13–20.1730%8 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0214%8 Jun →
vertigo10–130.0525%8 Jun →
ancient8–130.0527%8 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0126%7 Jun →
ancient13–20.1932%7 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0233%7 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0629%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.