EhtiS — CS2 Stats
FI76561199414491478[U:1:1454225750]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
- Avg rating -0.02
- Avg headshot accuracy 13%
- Avg reaction 609ms
Last 10
- 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
- Avg rating -0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 12%
- Avg reaction 645ms
Last 20
- 4–14–2 · 20% win rate
- Avg rating -0.03
- Avg headshot accuracy 14%
- Avg reaction 638ms
Newest first, from the last 30 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like jL 79% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 30 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 30 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
Strongest and weakest map need 5+ matches on two different maps — 1 of 9 maps qualify so far.
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | D | 9 | 1–8 | 11% | -0.03 |
 nuke | — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.04 |
 dust2 | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.02 |
 vertigo | — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.05 |
 inferno | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.02 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.03 |
 train | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
 cache | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.08 |
 anubis | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.10 |
Across the last 30 tracked matches.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.8176% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4249 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.2269% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cache | 13–5 | -0.08 | 8% | 22 May → | |
| nuke | 1–13 | -0.02 | 22% | 28 Mar → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 16 Mar → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | -0.06 | 14% | 12 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | 0.06 | 6% | 10 Mar → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 10 Mar → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 10 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | 0.01 | 15% | 10 Mar → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 10 Mar → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | -0.12 | 0% | 8 Mar → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 8 Mar → | |
| anubis | 4–13 | -0.10 | 13% | 8 Mar → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 7 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | -0.09 | 19% | 7 Mar → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.08 | 16% | 7 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | -0.03 | 18% | 6 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.11 | 21% | 6 Mar → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 6 Mar → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.04 | 21% | 6 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 1–13 | 0.07 | 10% | 6 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 12–11 | -0.01 | 19% | 5 Mar → | |
| train | 13–6 | -0.03 | 6% | 5 Mar → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.03 | 14% | 5 Mar → | |
| inferno | 3–9 | -0.13 | 20% | 4 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.11 | 10% | 4 Mar → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.06 | 25% | 4 Mar → | |
| train | 13–7 | -0.03 | 3% | 3 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–1 | 0.13 | 14% | 3 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 13–10 | 0.02 | 13% | 2 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–2 | 0.11 | 18% | 24 Oct → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.