Wattsy

Wattsy — CS2 Stats

AU76561199402524261[U:1:1442258533]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,203Tracked matches72%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,067Top 5% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5578 of 251234 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,067 +7,067 30 Aug – 9 Oct · 19 days played
19,44127,067peak 27,06730 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 773 +0 30 Aug – 6 Sept · 2 observations
773773peak 77330 Aug6 Sept
27,067Peak Premier in tracked matches
773Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 773
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,067
  • +7,067 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,933 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWattsyPREMIER27,067 · Red bandPEAK ELO773csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–33–5Last 10062%Win rateWWWWTWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +87ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility1.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility1.2
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time532ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy9.4%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 9.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 2 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · cache, 9 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W4Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 24dust2Weakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2418–675%-0.01
ancientA1811–761%-0.01
dust2C188–1044%-0.03
nukeA149–564%-0.02
infernoB105–550%-0.02
cacheS86–275%0.02
anubisA85–363%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

177Matches
47%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
82.8ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4848%1.1316.7
Dust24048%1.0716.0
Nuke2952%1.0817.0
Inferno2733%1.0116.3
Ancient1747%1.1114.8
Cache771%1.0215.7
Overpass450%0.6914.0
Anubis250%1.1822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
531msReaction time
58.0%T opening success
31.8%CT opening success
0.16Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
2.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.3142% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1599 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.763% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–5-0.0514%9 Oct →
cache13–50.0112%9 Oct →
cache8–00.0931%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0613%9 Oct →
dust212–12-0.044%9 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0211%4 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0611%4 Oct →
inferno6–90.004%4 Oct →
inferno9–2-0.016%4 Oct →
dust213–6-0.043%3 Oct →
mirage2–00.000%3 Oct →
dust21–13-0.057%3 Oct →
mirage10–0-0.0113%3 Oct →
mirage13–10.048%3 Oct →
dust21–13-0.117%3 Oct →
mirage13–0-0.0127%3 Oct →
ancient4–0-0.060%3 Oct →
inferno13–20.0313%3 Oct →
ancient4–1-0.160%3 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.039%3 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.043%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0614%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.058%2 Oct →
anubis16–140.0211%2 Oct →
mirage13–70.0515%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.045%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.008%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0110%2 Oct →
nuke13–160.0122%2 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.054%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.116%2 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.077%1 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.035%1 Oct →
cache13–20.0412%1 Oct →
inferno13–90.0119%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.075%30 Sept →
ancient13–50.088%30 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0623%26 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0216%26 Sept →
nuke2–2-0.0214%26 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.019%26 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0311%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.037%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0017%26 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0915%25 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0213%25 Sept →
dust213–6-0.039%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.014%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0817%25 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0416%25 Sept →
cache13–70.066%25 Sept →
cache13–90.038%25 Sept →
dust216–140.0113%25 Sept →
dust213–20.0913%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0721%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0113%25 Sept →
ancient13–90.038%25 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0115%23 Sept →
ancient9–130.0115%23 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.105%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0615%23 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0216%23 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.085%22 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0213%22 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0822%21 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.067%21 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0112%21 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0115%21 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0817%21 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.045%20 Sept →
dust216–120.0315%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.096%20 Sept →
ancient13–90.049%20 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0311%20 Sept →
mirage13–90.0113%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0424%20 Sept →
dust26–13-0.048%20 Sept →
anubis6–130.0018%19 Sept →
mirage10–00.0211%19 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0017%19 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0513%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0413%19 Sept →
cache13–100.0311%19 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0122%19 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0517%19 Sept →
dust215–150.0318%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0221%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0617%19 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0615%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0318%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0518%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0813%15 Sept →
ancient9–130.0115%14 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0319%14 Sept →
nuke9–3-0.015%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0410%13 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0417%13 Sept →
ancient16–130.0227%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0111%13 Sept →
ancient0–6-0.059%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.