Kurimei

Kurimei — CS2 Stats

76561199274187073[U:1:1313921345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,268Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,601Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#66434 of 225779 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,532 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 21 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

20,705Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,532Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-01-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,532
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 219 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,601
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,399 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKurimeiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,532 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,601 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,532csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning64
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464113Last 10046%Win rateLWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time582ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 9 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 11 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 3–3 · inferno, 28 Jan
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 25 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 44% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C32141844%0.00
mirageC25111444%0.02
infernoB115645%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
anubisS54180%0.08
cache42250%-0.02
vertigo41325%0.01
nuke31233%0.04
overpass31233%-0.01
train21150%0.01
office110100%0.04
mst_pistolmap_ver2.0110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

118Matches
54%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
89.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4149%1.1216.1
Dust24055%1.2118.1
Anubis1560%1.1718.9
Ancient1145%1.2318.4
Inferno580%1.7622.8
Nuke367%1.4316.7
Train250%0.8414.5
Overpass1100%1.2012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
577msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
4.63HE damage / grenade
9.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–130.0119%11 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0122%11 Sept
inferno11–130.019%11 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0116%11 Sept
mirage13–40.0531%11 Sept
inferno10–130.0112%11 Sept
mirage5–13-0.006%8 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0417%8 Sept
ancient13–90.0112%7 Sept
ancient16–140.0416%7 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0511%7 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0212%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0516%6 Sept
dust213–16-0.0216%6 Sept
mirage16–130.0110%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0816%16 Aug
dust210–130.0228%16 Aug
dust216–140.0514%9 Aug
anubis13–10.2013%9 Aug
nuke8–130.0117%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0714%9 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0110%9 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0214%4 Aug
dust210–130.0516%4 Aug
dust212–12-0.0315%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0213%31 Jul
train13–30.0315%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0021%31 Jul
dust213–10.0117%31 Jul
dust212–12-0.0420%25 Jul
cache8–130.0223%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0222%16 Jul
cache13–11-0.0319%9 Jul
dust213–50.0721%8 Jul
mirage13–50.0810%26 Jun
cache10–13-0.0315%23 May
cache13–6-0.0112%28 Apr
dust212–120.019%27 Apr
vertigo13–9-0.024%26 Apr
office13–90.0418%26 Apr
mirage13–50.0111%24 Apr
mirage0–4-0.050%13 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0613%12 Apr
dust25–13-0.0519%12 Apr
vertigo8–80.0115%6 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0613%1 Apr
mirage12–120.0617%19 Mar
dust213–7-0.0419%18 Mar
mirage12–120.0314%18 Mar
dust23–13-0.0216%9 Mar
dust213–60.1219%9 Mar
dust210–13-0.0219%3 Mar
dust29–13-0.0017%2 Mar
ancient6–13-0.073%1 Mar
dust27–130.0114%1 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0317%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.0111%26 Feb
dust216–13-0.0016%25 Feb
anubis13–00.1320%25 Feb
dust213–5-0.0322%25 Feb
overpass12–120.0022%24 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0324%20 Feb
dust213–10-0.0414%20 Feb
dust216–12-0.0320%20 Feb
mirage13–80.0724%19 Feb
dust27–13-0.0212%18 Feb
inferno13–60.0414%18 Feb
mirage13–40.099%15 Feb
mirage8–130.0116%14 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0310%8 Feb
dust212–120.0112%6 Feb
inferno6–90.0326%5 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0126%5 Feb
mst_pistolmap_ver2.013–100.0727%4 Feb
dust211–10-0.0624%3 Feb
dust213–50.0423%3 Feb
dust27–130.0322%3 Feb
mirage9–130.0514%2 Feb
vertigo8–80.0214%2 Feb
ancient12–120.0613%2 Feb
ancient8–130.0315%1 Feb
inferno13–90.0013%1 Feb
dust213–60.0311%1 Feb
vertigo11–130.0217%1 Feb
train9–13-0.0017%31 Jan
inferno13–50.0413%31 Jan
dust24–13-0.0523%29 Jan
inferno7–130.0312%28 Jan
dust213–6-0.0114%28 Jan
inferno3–3-0.0125%28 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0614%28 Jan
dust213–00.0919%28 Jan
anubis13–40.0921%26 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0124%26 Jan
nuke13–50.1020%26 Jan
dust213–8-0.0318%26 Jan
mirage13–80.0710%24 Jan
dust210–13-0.0012%23 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0110%22 Jan
mirage12–120.0718%21 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →