Simp no Pimp — CS2 Stats

76561199263225268[U:1:1302959540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,561Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,700 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning44

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateWWLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression2.2

Utility5.1

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels0.5

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning4.4

Utility5.1

Mechanics8.9

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time559ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.8%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–9

13–0Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	33	15–18	45%	-0.01
anubis	B	21	11–10	52%	0.00
mirage	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.02
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.04
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
inferno	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,941Matches

49%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

73.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	629	50%	1.05	15.3
Ancient	263	49%	0.98	15.1
Nuke	262	50%	1.03	14.9
Anubis	230	49%	1.04	15.2
Mirage	190	41%	0.92	14.0
Inferno	176	49%	1.10	15.8
Overpass	80	50%	1.05	15.2
Train	66	48%	1.00	14.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

90.1%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

548msReaction time

18.2%T opening success

46.1%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

9.86HE damage / grenade

7.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.2266% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–4	0.06	30%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	26%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	12%	27 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.13	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	18%	27 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	10%	27 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	2%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	8%	24 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	25%	24 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.00	14%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	14%	17 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	11%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	12%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	14%	14 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.02	21%	13 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.03	28%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	14%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	15%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	14%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	17%	11 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	22%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.05	39%	7 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.08	31%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	12%	5 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.09	25%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	27%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	8%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	34%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.00	15%	3 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	23%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	33%	31 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	30%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	10%	28 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	19%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	16%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	20%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.12	10%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.05	32%	24 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	29%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	15%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	17%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	14%	21 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	27%	20 Jul →
dust2	19–16	-0.06	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.07	24%	19 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.06	16%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.04	18%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.12	16%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	11%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	19–16	-0.02	19%	16 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	23%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	28%	15 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.06	29%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	23%	14 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	22%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	3%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	16%	13 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	13%	11 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.08	26%	11 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.08	31%	8 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	22%	8 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	21%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	23%	7 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.00	23%	5 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.01	21%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	32%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	23%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	23%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	24%	3 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	18%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.00	17%	3 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.06	16%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	18%	2 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.01	15%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.06	21%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	25%	2 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.10	18%	2 Jul →