BOT DEEZ

BOT DEEZ — CS2 Stats

76561199240960277[U:1:1280694549]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,789Tracked matches79%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,120Top 10% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19810 of 258294 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,090 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,120 +4,213 28 Aug – 24 Oct · 14 days played
20,90725,120peak 25,12028 Aug24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,090 +0 28 Aug – 23 Oct · 12 observations
1,0901,090peak 1,09028 Aug23 Oct
25,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,090Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,090
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,120
  • +3,353 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,880 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBOT DEEZFACEITLevel 8 · 1,090 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,120 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,090csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning64
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–38–3Last 10059%Win rateLWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy30.4%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 23 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · cache, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 48% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3316–1748%0.02
dust2A1710–759%0.02
nukeS1612–475%0.00
ancientB126–650%0.03
cacheS97–278%0.03
anubisA95–456%-0.01
inferno—32–167%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 33). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

742Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24351%1.1216.3
Ancient13553%1.1516.8
Dust213245%1.1015.0
Anubis9247%1.1116.3
Nuke7056%1.1817.4
Cache4146%1.2815.9
Inferno1644%0.9315.2
Overpass1040%0.8613.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.8%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.71HE damage / grenade
7.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2065% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0715%28 Oct →
dust222–18-0.0020%27 Oct →
mirage13–100.0316%27 Oct →
ancient11–130.0320%27 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0023%26 Oct →
dust213–30.0331%25 Oct →
cache13–20.0336%25 Oct →
nuke13–10.0628%25 Oct →
mirage7–30.0114%25 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.1139%24 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0132%24 Oct →
mirage13–50.0336%24 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0410%24 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0229%24 Oct →
ancient11–130.0016%24 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0541%24 Oct →
cache11–2-0.0332%24 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0235%24 Oct →
mirage11–130.0617%24 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0357%23 Oct →
overpass13–70.1439%23 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0223%23 Oct →
nuke13–10.0137%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0136%23 Oct →
mirage13–20.0729%23 Oct →
cache13–40.0232%23 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0550%23 Oct →
dust213–20.1233%23 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0432%23 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0121%23 Oct →
cache13–50.0726%23 Oct →
mirage13–70.0534%23 Oct →
cache10–130.0267%23 Oct →
nuke13–100.0119%22 Oct →
mirage13–80.0925%22 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0629%22 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0212%22 Oct →
cache13–60.0625%22 Oct →
dust213–30.0341%22 Oct →
nuke13–40.0527%22 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0338%22 Oct →
nuke13–80.0142%21 Oct →
mirage13–30.0329%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0524%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.1125%21 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
mirage9–130.0427%20 Oct →
dust210–130.0229%20 Oct →
nuke9–130.0427%20 Oct →
mirage11–130.0922%20 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0214%20 Oct →
dust25–130.0726%20 Oct →
nuke9–130.0220%20 Oct →
ancient7–130.0216%20 Oct →
cache13–80.0625%20 Oct →
anubis13–10.0820%20 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0024%18 Oct →
mirage5–80.0227%18 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0616%18 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0222%18 Oct →
mirage13–90.0748%17 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0217%17 Oct →
ancient13–20.1919%17 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0433%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0219%17 Oct →
ancient13–70.0726%17 Oct →
nuke13–70.0336%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.1223%16 Oct →
nuke7–130.0535%16 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0726%16 Oct →
dust213–110.0326%16 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0320%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0621%15 Oct →
anubis16–130.0338%15 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0433%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0526%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.0827%14 Oct →
mirage10–130.0322%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0433%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0130%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0431%13 Oct →
mirage4–130.0235%12 Oct →
mirage4–130.0430%12 Oct →
dust213–80.0427%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0125%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.0132%11 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0125%11 Oct →
mirage5–130.0620%11 Oct →
dust28–130.0032%11 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0439%11 Oct →
anubis13–80.0313%11 Oct →
dust210–130.0747%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.0124%11 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0032%10 Oct →
ancient13–100.0420%10 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0245%10 Oct →
cache19–160.0136%9 Oct →
mirage13–80.0825%9 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0231%9 Oct →
anubis16–120.0321%9 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.