ุ

— CS2 Stats

TJ76561199226560474[U:1:1266294746]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,840Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,244 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,244 → 1,244
+5Tracked matches · now 1,840
−10.3ppWin rate · 51.7% → 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 30 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,432 +89 30 Jan31 Mar · 7 days played
18,68219,555peak 19,55530 Jan31 Mar
19,661Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,244Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,244
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 107 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 8 · 1,244 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,244csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning49
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46459Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time564ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+7.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 8 Feb
54%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · vertigo, 9 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · vertigo, 26 Mar
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 31 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB29131645%0.00
vertigoD1861233%0.04
mirageA138562%-0.00
dust2S107370%0.01
ancientB84450%0.05
infernoS64267%0.04
anubisD62433%0.00
overpassD51420%-0.03
cache3030%0.08
debris1010%-0.14
train110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

223Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
82.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6357%1.1013.9
Dust23644%1.1516.2
Ancient3259%1.3318.0
Inferno2850%1.3015.9
Nuke2560%1.3319.1
Anubis2438%1.1715.7
Overpass1354%1.3318.8
Train10%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
580msReaction time
29.1%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.90HE damage / grenade
14.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1176% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–130.0116%16 Sept
nuke6–70.007%15 Sept
dust210–130.0725%12 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0417%11 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0714%11 Sept
nuke12–120.0620%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1112%4 Sept
mirage13–110.0118%2 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0223%31 Aug
nuke13–90.0537%31 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0535%30 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0420%29 Aug
overpass8–8-0.1121%23 Aug
ancient10–130.0321%23 Aug
nuke3–130.1035%17 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0035%3 Aug
debris3–9-0.1416%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0527%21 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0231%21 Jul
inferno9–30.1621%24 Jun
inferno9–40.0920%24 Jun
nuke5–9-0.1424%24 Jun
train13–40.1539%17 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0339%13 Jun
ancient13–110.0920%13 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0829%7 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0516%2 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0616%20 May
cache8–130.1746%19 May
nuke1–130.0129%7 May
cache5–130.0532%29 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0321%15 Apr
nuke9–60.0930%15 Apr
nuke9–50.0315%15 Apr
vertigo8–8-0.0436%15 Apr
dust213–70.0520%3 Apr
dust210–13-0.0315%2 Apr
dust216–13-0.0319%2 Apr
mirage13–60.0919%1 Apr
vertigo8–8-0.0417%31 Mar
vertigo9–50.0943%31 Mar
vertigo8–80.0110%31 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0317%31 Mar
nuke13–10.067%31 Mar
mirage12–160.0124%31 Mar
nuke16–140.0517%30 Mar
dust213–110.0114%28 Mar
mirage13–90.0027%27 Mar
vertigo8–80.0215%27 Mar
dust213–100.0317%26 Mar
vertigo7–9-0.0322%26 Mar
vertigo9–50.1235%24 Mar
vertigo6–9-0.0920%22 Mar
overpass13–110.0242%19 Mar
vertigo4–90.0213%19 Mar
nuke8–130.0628%19 Mar
anubis11–00.0813%12 Mar
vertigo8–80.0816%12 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0624%12 Mar
vertigo9–70.0754%9 Mar
vertigo9–50.1217%9 Mar
ancient9–130.0416%8 Mar
vertigo8–80.2427%8 Mar
nuke11–130.0211%7 Mar
mirage5–13-0.077%6 Mar
inferno6–130.0318%5 Mar
vertigo9–50.0814%5 Mar
nuke2–130.0620%5 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0311%2 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0215%1 Mar
ancient13–110.0914%27 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0420%27 Feb
nuke11–130.0625%26 Feb
mirage16–130.0530%24 Feb
overpass5–130.0415%24 Feb
inferno13–8-0.027%23 Feb
dust211–130.014%20 Feb
nuke19–160.0314%18 Feb
vertigo8–8-0.069%16 Feb
vertigo9–10.2421%8 Feb
dust213–90.0618%6 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0121%6 Feb
anubis6–130.0622%5 Feb
nuke13–30.0211%4 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0111%1 Feb
ancient13–110.0213%1 Feb
vertigo5–9-0.1112%1 Feb
vertigo6–90.0115%1 Feb
ancient9–130.098%1 Feb
mirage14–160.0515%31 Jan
nuke13–90.0516%31 Jan
dust213–11-0.0216%31 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0113%31 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0521%31 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0230%31 Jan
ancient13–80.0318%30 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0050%30 Jan
mirage13–90.0314%30 Jan
dust213–9-0.0615%30 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0711%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →