Ännjanluhqa

Ännjanluhqa — CS2 Stats

SE76561199211582708[U:1:1251316980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,261Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+15Tracked matches · now 2,261
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 31 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

21Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGÄnnjanluhqaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning47
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5149Last 10051%Win rateWLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −110ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.7
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time561ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · vertigo, 1 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · tuscan_d, 31 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 22 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35191654%-0.03
vertigoA149564%-0.02
dust2D134931%-0.03
cacheA117464%-0.04
anubisB105550%-0.02
inferno41325%-0.02
ancient31233%-0.02
nuke31233%-0.03
cbble_d21150%-0.01
overpass21150%-0.08
shelter110100%0.09
season_d_prefab1010%-0.03
tuscan_d110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

136Matches
54%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
67.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6166%0.9415.4
Anubis1953%0.8813.1
Nuke1650%0.7212.1
Overpass1354%0.7412.0
Dust2838%0.7013.4
Ancient617%0.7311.3
Cache617%0.528.5
Vertigo450%0.9413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
560msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
2.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.1809 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3829% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–6-0.0422%22 Sept
dust27–13-0.078%22 Sept
anubis13–100.0116%20 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0228%20 Sept
anubis13–20.0215%19 Sept
shelter13–50.0927%19 Sept
dust26–13-0.0115%18 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0515%18 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0522%18 Sept
dust29–13-0.0221%17 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0711%17 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0511%17 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.0217%16 Sept
dust210–13-0.039%16 Sept
mirage6–130.0215%16 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0216%16 Sept
cache13–10-0.0514%16 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0113%16 Sept
dust213–9-0.0426%16 Sept
anubis13–80.019%15 Sept
inferno2–130.0125%15 Sept
dust25–13-0.028%15 Sept
vertigo13–110.0322%15 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0112%15 Sept
dust213–60.0316%15 Sept
vertigo16–13-0.049%15 Sept
cache8–13-0.0218%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0011%15 Sept
vertigo9–130.0115%14 Sept
nuke8–13-0.064%14 Sept
dust29–130.0110%14 Sept
vertigo16–14-0.0214%14 Sept
mirage10–13-0.063%14 Sept
dust213–6-0.0213%13 Sept
vertigo13–20.0610%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0812%13 Sept
cache13–6-0.0620%13 Sept
mirage13–10.0815%12 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0116%12 Sept
mirage19–17-0.0218%11 Sept
anubis2–6-0.120%11 Sept
cache13–7-0.0117%11 Sept
anubis13–100.019%11 Sept
ancient5–130.0214%10 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0326%10 Sept
cache19–16-0.0515%10 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0413%10 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0412%10 Sept
mirage16–14-0.1016%10 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1024%10 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0015%10 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0113%10 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0114%10 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0017%10 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.089%10 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0524%10 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0913%10 Sept
mirage10–130.0716%10 Sept
dust27–13-0.087%9 Sept
cache11–13-0.0521%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0119%8 Sept
mirage6–130.0115%8 Sept
mirage6–13-0.045%8 Sept
mirage13–10-0.027%8 Sept
mirage13–100.0116%8 Sept
cache9–13-0.0614%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0716%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.058%4 Sept
nuke13–40.0021%4 Sept
season_d_prefab11–13-0.0316%4 Sept
cbble_d8–13-0.0521%4 Sept
mirage9–13-0.075%4 Sept
mirage13–110.0417%4 Sept
overpass7–13-0.0917%4 Sept
cache13–7-0.0511%4 Sept
anubis13–50.056%4 Sept
mirage13–5-0.012%4 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0819%4 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0414%4 Sept
dust210–13-0.0911%4 Sept
overpass13–11-0.067%4 Sept
cache13–10-0.007%3 Sept
mirage0–10-0.0218%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0218%3 Sept
mirage13–11-0.049%3 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0222%2 Sept
vertigo13–4-0.0713%2 Sept
vertigo19–22-0.0416%1 Sept
vertigo13–40.1011%1 Sept
cache13–9-0.0218%1 Sept
dust213–70.0621%1 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0417%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0317%31 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0812%31 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0917%31 Aug
vertigo8–130.0020%31 Aug
dust25–13-0.0722%31 Aug
cache5–13-0.0711%31 Aug
tuscan_d13–3-0.0135%31 Aug
cbble_d13–70.0317%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →