5 GUM CHEWER

5 GUM CHEWER — CS2 Stats

76561199208950742[U:1:1248685014]Steam profile ↗

2,871Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG5 GUM CHEWERFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning46
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT563212Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time630ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2491538%-0.01
vertigoB189950%0.00
infernoS1711665%-0.02
anubisA117464%0.00
dust2C94544%-0.05
ancientS76186%-0.01
overpassS75271%0.01
nuke32167%0.02
mirage21150%-0.04
fachwerk110100%0.03
train110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

222Matches
59%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
72.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2171%1.1615.5
Anubis1771%1.2515.8
Vertigo1250%0.9515.1
Overpass757%1.6017.9
Mirage450%0.8214.3
Dust2250%2.1414.0
Nuke10%0.7112.0
Train10%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
630msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
5.71HE damage / grenade
7.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.426 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–16-0.0422%16 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0338%16 Jul
fachwerk13–40.0329%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0422%10 Jul
inferno0–3-0.040%10 Jul
cache13–4-0.0022%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0523%10 Jul
cache13–70.0416%6 Jul
dust213–50.0127%6 Jul
anubis13–100.0916%6 Jul
vertigo1–5-0.070%6 Jul
cache13–10-0.0325%6 Jul
inferno7–1-0.028%6 Jul
anubis13–100.0022%6 Jul
vertigo13–40.0118%5 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0227%5 Jul
cache2–130.0630%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0733%5 Jul
vertigo13–90.0625%3 Jul
overpass13–40.0924%3 Jul
dust213–8-0.0525%3 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0220%3 Jul
cache4–13-0.0729%3 Jul
cache4–13-0.0514%3 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0526%3 Jul
nuke13–110.1221%2 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0015%2 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0327%2 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0818%2 Jul
inferno4–13-0.1120%2 Jul
anubis13–50.0025%24 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0227%24 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0122%24 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0620%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0825%15 Jun
overpass12–120.0019%5 Jun
ancient5–0-0.050%5 Jun
nuke10–60.0430%5 Jun
train13–5-0.0114%5 Jun
vertigo4–13-0.0627%5 Jun
vertigo12–120.0411%4 Jun
vertigo12–120.0229%4 Jun
dust24–13-0.0829%4 Jun
vertigo2–13-0.0229%4 Jun
vertigo13–100.0029%4 Jun
cache13–10.0319%4 Jun
ancient13–70.0423%4 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0134%4 Jun
anubis13–40.0132%4 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0122%3 Jun
cache7–1-0.0121%3 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0227%3 Jun
mirage2–11-0.045%3 Jun
vertigo13–110.0423%3 Jun
vertigo13–2-0.0321%3 Jun
anubis7–30.0330%27 May
vertigo12–120.0240%27 May
inferno10–13-0.0232%26 May
cache0–4-0.120%26 May
dust22–8-0.1423%26 May
cache12–12-0.0622%26 May
inferno13–100.0534%25 May
anubis13–6-0.0214%24 May
cache4–130.0123%24 May
dust24–13-0.0214%24 May
cache12–120.0012%24 May
overpass11–13-0.0524%24 May
dust27–13-0.0422%22 May
cache12–120.0434%22 May
cache9–8-0.0124%21 May
inferno13–20.0022%21 May
cache13–7-0.0827%18 May
inferno13–6-0.0229%18 May
ancient6–50.0431%18 May
dust213–9-0.0419%17 May
inferno13–5-0.0324%17 May
ancient13–4-0.0323%16 May
inferno13–80.0113%16 May
cache4–13-0.0126%16 May
overpass13–7-0.0526%16 May
cache13–00.1530%16 May
vertigo13–60.0220%16 May
overpass13–40.0313%16 May
dust26–13-0.0536%16 May
cache7–13-0.0519%16 May
inferno13–80.0118%16 May
cache12–12-0.0520%8 May
inferno13–50.0358%8 May
cache12–12-0.0025%8 May
vertigo13–9-0.0127%8 May
vertigo7–13-0.0412%7 May
cache13–80.0027%7 May
cache12–12-0.0321%7 May
cache13–6-0.0134%29 Apr
vertigo0–13-0.0432%21 Apr
vertigo13–60.0922%11 Apr
dust213–7-0.0318%2 Apr
overpass13–40.0430%2 Apr
anubis13–90.0428%2 Apr
anubis3–5-0.0023%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →