Stormkan

Stormkan — CS2 Stats

HK76561199202834741[U:1:1242569013]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,050Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,278Hours in CS67Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating29,176Top 1% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1123 of 252675 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,620 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,176 +1,990 1 Sept – 16 Oct · 12 days played
27,18629,400peak 29,4001 Sept16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,620 +0 1 Sept – 17 Sept · 3 observations
2,6202,620peak 2,6201 Sept17 Sept
29,400Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,620Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,620
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 380 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 224 below peak (29,400)
  • +909 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 824 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate57.1%50.9%
Shot accuracy4.3%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.361.09
Match win rate56.5%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStormkanFACEITLevel 10 · 2,620 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER29,176 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,620csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–32–6Last 10062%Win rateLWWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time499ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 507ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy28.9%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 14 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 29 Sept →
281msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 29 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15ancientWeakest map · 50% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3721–1657%0.03
mirageS2114–767%0.06
anubisS1511–473%0.07
ancientB105–550%0.05
infernoB84–450%0.03
nukeA53–260%0.05
cache—33–0100%0.05
vertigo—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,196Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
5,821Matches
56.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
57.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
4.3%Shot accuracy
15,785MVPs
6,304Hours (in match)
6,030Bombs planted
1,592Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4788,781
AWP16,609
MP92,741
SSG 082,602
Knife1,364

Lifetime map wins

14,591dust2
6,941inferno
4,106nuke
1,686vertigo
1,240train
305office
51italy
45cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

801Matches
56%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
86.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23454%1.3217.9
Dust221461%1.4118.4
Anubis9856%1.2617.4
Ancient9454%1.3717.2
Inferno7351%1.3117.2
Nuke5360%1.3519.1
Train956%1.2018.8
Overpass862%1.4815.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.0%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
517msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
60.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
12.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.9895% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–130.0223%16 Oct →
dust213–110.0315%14 Oct →
ancient13–40.2039%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0825%14 Oct →
dust213–70.1839%13 Oct →
dust213–40.0627%12 Oct →
ancient1–40.0417%12 Oct →
anubis13–40.0919%12 Oct →
anubis14–160.0721%11 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0232%11 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0128%10 Oct →
dust213–80.0731%7 Oct →
dust22–00.000%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.0632%4 Oct →
dust211–130.0324%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.0136%4 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0013%1 Oct →
ancient5–130.0433%30 Sept →
inferno9–130.0829%30 Sept →
dust211–130.0620%30 Sept →
dust29–130.0031%30 Sept →
anubis11–130.0624%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.0224%30 Sept →
dust213–70.1025%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.1721%30 Sept →
inferno13–20.1143%30 Sept →
dust213–6-0.02100%29 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0440%29 Sept →
dust26–130.0122%29 Sept →
mirage13–80.0219%29 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0132%29 Sept →
mirage13–100.0830%28 Sept →
mirage13–10.1440%27 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0122%27 Sept →
anubis13–70.0213%27 Sept →
ancient13–20.0118%27 Sept →
cache13–50.0122%27 Sept →
dust213–10.0014%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0524%27 Sept →
dust212–120.0320%26 Sept →
mirage8–130.0424%26 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0225%26 Sept →
ancient5–130.0138%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0713%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0228%26 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0921%26 Sept →
mirage12–120.0622%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0416%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.1425%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0227%26 Sept →
dust213–10.0111%25 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0024%25 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0030%25 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0429%25 Sept →
anubis13–80.1234%25 Sept →
mirage6–130.1028%25 Sept →
nuke6–130.0325%25 Sept →
dust213–80.1538%25 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0131%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0930%25 Sept →
dust212–120.0634%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0212%24 Sept →
nuke13–20.0718%24 Sept →
cache13–90.1023%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0235%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0228%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0317%24 Sept →
mirage13–110.0516%24 Sept →
mirage13–160.0419%23 Sept →
dust211–130.0733%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0121%23 Sept →
anubis13–90.0336%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.1025%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.1022%22 Sept →
anubis13–30.1025%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0025%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.1134%22 Sept →
mirage13–50.1234%21 Sept →
dust25–1-0.0264%21 Sept →
anubis13–100.0722%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0431%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
dust213–100.1520%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.1125%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.0330%20 Sept →
anubis3–130.0517%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0913%20 Sept →
dust29–130.0222%20 Sept →
anubis4–130.0232%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0822%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0921%20 Sept →
mirage7–130.1023%20 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0239%20 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0321%19 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0126%19 Sept →
anubis13–0-0.0117%19 Sept →
mirage2–130.0739%19 Sept →
mirage11–130.0121%19 Sept →
ancient13–60.0323%19 Sept →
anubis13–30.1534%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.