FAZERY — CS2 Stats

76561199175852960[U:1:1215587232]✓ No bans

4,736Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,926Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#960 of 17589 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 4,430 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning66

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression7.0

Utility6.6

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.6

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact1.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time477ms−68ms

first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms

Headshot accuracy26.7%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–0Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 12dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	16–12	57%	0.06
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.06
anubis	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	0.02
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.06
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.16
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,941Matches

55%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

90.3ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1144	55%	1.27	17.8
Ancient	907	56%	1.36	18.3
Anubis	637	53%	1.25	17.7
Dust2	487	56%	1.28	18.3
Vertigo	199	56%	1.19	16.4
Inferno	147	50%	1.30	16.9
Nuke	121	52%	1.27	17.9
Overpass	80	58%	1.26	17.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy

39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

83.8%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

467msReaction time

33.7%T opening success

50.6%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

12.5%Flash assists

7.39HE damage / grenade

9.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.6809% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–3	0.06	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	45%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.12	35%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.17	28%	12 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.08	43%	10 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	33%	10 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	33%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	24%	8 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.01	22%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	32%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	21%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.00	36%	6 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.05	19%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	31%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	26%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	13%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	30%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.07	27%	5 Aug →
nuke	15–19	-0.01	28%	28 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	18%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.10	38%	22 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.04	26%	22 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	47%	21 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.12	29%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.06	27%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	25%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.13	33%	13 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.07	55%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.09	40%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.12	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.13	31%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	27%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.22	28%	11 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.04	0%	10 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.12	27%	9 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.04	44%	5 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	21%	4 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	16%	1 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	30%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.11	27%	29 Jun →
anubis	5–0	-0.01	20%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	13%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.11	21%	24 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.13	40%	22 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.06	24%	22 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	30%	19 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.07	27%	19 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	21%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.12	32%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.13	27%	15 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	26%	15 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	34%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–0	0.15	18%	14 Jun →
inferno	0–3	-0.00	40%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	16%	12 Jun →
vertigo	9–6	0.11	28%	27 May →
anubis	13–6	0.11	38%	27 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	7%	26 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	15%	25 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	23%	25 May →
mirage	13–6	0.05	27%	25 May →
mirage	11–13	0.06	15%	9 May →
ancient	16–13	0.04	16%	7 May →
inferno	15–15	0.09	28%	4 May →
nuke	4–13	0.01	33%	2 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	21%	22 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.06	30%	18 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.04	32%	18 Apr →
vertigo	9–1	0.22	29%	13 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.18	36%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.20	36%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.15	33%	3 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	20%	31 Mar →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	15%	29 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.18	39%	28 Mar →
nuke	6–13	0.06	23%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.02	16%	27 Mar →
anubis	9–13	0.07	43%	22 Mar →
dust2	3–13	0.04	24%	22 Mar →
ancient	13–0	0.21	38%	22 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.14	22%	18 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	20%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.10	24%	15 Mar →
nuke	10–4	0.02	29%	15 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.11	31%	15 Mar →
overpass	13–11	0.16	40%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.24	33%	7 Mar →
mirage	3–7	0.02	58%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.10	22%	7 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	25%	7 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.03	23%	7 Mar →