Rubah

Rubah — CS2 Stats

LT76561199174020288[U:1:1213754560]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,419Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,105 → 2,105
+6Tracked matches · now 1,419
+7.2ppWin rate · 57.1% → 64.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 11 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,668 +805 11 Nov30 Jun · 19 days played
25,08226,999peak 26,99911 Nov30 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,105 +0 31 Aug17 Sept · 4 observations
2,1052,105peak 2,10531 Aug17 Sept
27,095Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,105Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-11-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,105
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 395 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRubahPEAK ELO2,105csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning50
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59356Last 10059%Win rateWWLWLTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +7.6pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.07), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time596ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 20 Apr
57%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · office, 30 Nov
297msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 11 May
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 90% over 10ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1711665%0.04
mirageA148657%0.00
dust2S1410471%0.00
ancientD113827%0.01
nukeS109190%0.02
officeS64267%0.06
cacheS54180%0.05
overpassC52340%0.02
trainA53260%0.02
vertigo42250%0.03
anubis32167%0.03
debris110100%0.13
italy1010%0.01
sanctum1010%-0.04
warden1010%0.08
poseidon1010%0.07
agency1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

638Matches
55%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
84.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3868%1.0314.6
Ancient3656%0.9814.0
Anubis2850%0.9112.6
Vertigo2548%0.8912.6
Inferno1450%1.1416.7
Dust2757%1.1517.7
Nuke633%1.1520.5
Overpass560%1.0519.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
590msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
12.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0220%14 Sept
cache13–20.0648%13 Sept
ancient5–60.0818%10 Sept
nuke13–70.0429%9 Sept
inferno8–130.0024%4 Sept
office12–120.0333%3 Sept
debris9–10.1323%2 Sept
ancient10–130.0430%2 Sept
cache13–90.0118%1 Sept
dust213–110.0127%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0431%11 Jul
cache13–7-0.0414%5 Jul
dust213–110.0016%30 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0535%16 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0214%11 Jun
inferno9–6-0.0511%3 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0317%3 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0718%3 Jun
dust29–10.0418%1 Jun
office13–8-0.0322%17 May
office13–80.0632%17 May
nuke16–14-0.0332%15 May
vertigo5–9-0.0026%11 May
mirage10–13-0.0321%11 May
dust21–13-0.0729%11 May
nuke9–50.1233%7 May
italy9–130.0123%7 May
ancient15–150.0422%7 May
cache13–80.0328%30 Apr
cache2–130.1823%30 Apr
sanctum6–9-0.0422%30 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0236%26 Apr
dust213–2-0.0028%26 Apr
anubis13–80.1035%23 Apr
inferno13–100.0832%22 Apr
inferno9–50.2123%20 Apr
overpass9–10.2019%20 Apr
warden9–130.0831%20 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0438%15 Apr
inferno9–40.1737%15 Apr
inferno9–10.1240%15 Apr
dust28–13-0.0640%14 Apr
vertigo7–90.1333%14 Apr
nuke13–80.1438%7 Apr
inferno11–130.0023%18 Mar
mirage13–100.0325%18 Mar
inferno1–13-0.0513%12 Mar
overpass9–4-0.0412%12 Mar
dust213–40.0247%12 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0022%10 Mar
overpass15–15-0.0320%10 Mar
nuke9–2-0.0635%4 Mar
train5–130.0330%25 Feb
train13–100.0037%25 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0028%23 Feb
vertigo13–6-0.0138%17 Feb
poseidon8–80.0726%17 Feb
mirage16–140.0025%17 Feb
ancient13–110.0332%16 Feb
ancient13–100.0138%16 Feb
nuke13–10.0832%9 Feb
anubis16–130.0227%23 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0010%22 Jan
office10–130.0637%21 Jan
office13–40.0548%21 Jan
ancient4–50.0232%16 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0332%16 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0110%14 Jan
mirage13–100.0119%14 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0015%14 Jan
dust28–13-0.0522%14 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0421%13 Jan
inferno16–140.0113%12 Jan
inferno13–70.0125%9 Jan
train5–130.0113%9 Jan
dust216–130.0429%9 Jan
dust213–40.0122%9 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0425%6 Jan
train13–11-0.0121%5 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0129%12 Dec
agency7–130.0728%11 Dec
mirage13–50.0220%10 Dec
inferno13–110.0824%5 Dec
inferno13–10-0.0032%5 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0136%5 Dec
nuke16–14-0.0323%3 Dec
vertigo13–100.0116%1 Dec
mirage13–90.1121%1 Dec
office4–10.1857%30 Nov
dust213–60.0524%20 Nov
inferno13–60.0520%19 Nov
overpass8–130.0026%19 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0120%16 Nov
dust213–110.0718%14 Nov
dust29–13-0.0523%14 Nov
inferno13–10-0.0034%13 Nov
train13–10.0927%12 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0319%12 Nov
inferno12–120.0930%11 Nov
dust213–80.0119%11 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →