Machaca

Machaca — CS2 Stats

IN76561199171350680[U:1:1211084952]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

494Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,134Blue band · top ~38.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,134 -499 26 Aug – 25 Oct · 41 days played
9,73414,757peak 14,75726 Aug25 Oct
14,777Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,623 below peak (14,757)
  • +2,651 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,866 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMachacaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,134 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning41
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility5.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 31 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · dust2, 15 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 3 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC198–1142%-0.00
infernoS1812–667%-0.01
dust2B168–850%-0.02
nukeA169–756%-0.01
anubisD123–925%0.01
ancientB105–550%-0.00
cacheA95–456%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
49%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
65.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23043%0.9513.2
Mirage2658%0.8411.2
Inferno2055%0.9012.5
Ancient1735%1.0214.7
Anubis1765%0.8713.8
Cache757%0.899.3
Nuke617%0.7211.0
Vertigo2100%1.4414.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
64.1%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
571msReaction time
49.4%T opening success
28.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.42HE damage / grenade
12.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5037° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0424%25 Oct →
cache13–100.0919%21 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0515%21 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0122%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.029%20 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0214%19 Oct →
inferno13–60.0230%19 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.025%19 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0427%19 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0430%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0820%17 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0725%16 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0012%16 Oct →
inferno13–40.0411%15 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0114%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0123%14 Oct →
anubis15–150.0321%13 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.016%13 Oct →
ancient4–130.0010%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0826%11 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0332%11 Oct →
mirage13–10.0911%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.0119%9 Oct →
nuke13–70.0315%9 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.055%9 Oct →
mirage8–130.0213%9 Oct →
dust216–120.0420%7 Oct →
nuke6–130.0420%7 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0811%7 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0329%6 Oct →
inferno10–130.0419%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0221%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0015%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0122%4 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0320%3 Oct →
anubis13–40.1016%3 Oct →
ancient5–130.0417%3 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0711%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0416%3 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0411%3 Oct →
inferno16–140.0310%2 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0318%2 Oct →
anubis13–100.0116%2 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0710%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0325%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0011%29 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0131%29 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0420%29 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0417%28 Sept →
mirage2–130.0016%24 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0011%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0114%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0219%22 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0014%21 Sept →
cache14–160.0115%21 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0418%20 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.1010%20 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0115%16 Sept →
dust20–6-0.09100%15 Sept →
mirage13–100.0323%15 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0517%15 Sept →
anubis15–150.0614%14 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0915%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0623%14 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0222%9 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0210%9 Sept →
mirage15–150.0615%8 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.009%7 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0215%7 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
nuke13–80.0110%5 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0217%5 Sept →
anubis7–130.0214%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0515%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0420%5 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0621%4 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0615%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0821%3 Sept →
dust21–13-0.043%3 Sept →
dust26–130.0921%3 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0730%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0115%2 Sept →
ancient6–130.0110%2 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0623%1 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0119%1 Sept →
dust213–60.0827%1 Sept →
mirage15–150.0421%1 Sept →
ancient13–20.1231%31 Aug →
anubis6–130.1228%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.0617%31 Aug →
inferno13–70.0019%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0114%29 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.019%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0115%28 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0117%27 Aug →
cache13–160.0017%27 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0322%27 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0712%27 Aug →
cache13–80.0214%27 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0724%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.