AttermanN

AttermanN — CS2 Stats

DK76561199166397928[U:1:1206132200]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,470Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,957 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,957 → 1,957
+10Tracked matches · now 3,470
+6.7ppWin rate · 60.0% → 66.7%

Rating over time

1,957Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,957
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAttermanNFACEITLevel 9 · 1,957 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,957csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning63
Utility83

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–45Last 10055%Win rateWWLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility8.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 83 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.3
Utility8.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time518ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 498ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 16–13 · ancient, 24 May →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 10 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–12 · nuke, 17 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2614–1254%0.00
ancientA2616–1062%0.01
nukeS1813–572%0.03
dust2D92–722%0.01
anubisS75–271%0.00
cacheC73–443%0.01
overpassD62–433%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,548Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient50848%1.1315.4
Inferno49349%1.1115.5
Nuke43057%1.1115.5
Vertigo16153%1.1217.0
Anubis15444%1.0415.0
Train15251%1.0314.7
Overpass11537%0.9514.5
Mirage6252%1.0314.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
527msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
65.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
13.6%Flash assists
11.63HE damage / grenade
17.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.4795% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–20.0828%29 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0111%19 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
nuke0–120.0632%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0625%17 Sept →
dust213–90.0424%15 Sept →
ancient13–70.049%15 Sept →
ancient10–130.047%15 Sept →
ancient13–90.0013%18 Aug →
dust213–100.1013%18 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.017%18 Aug →
inferno13–100.0215%11 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0310%10 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.029%10 Aug →
ancient13–40.0515%14 Jul →
nuke8–130.0927%14 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0015%2 Jul →
ancient13–100.0310%2 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0219%1 Jul →
nuke13–80.0212%21 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.025%21 Jun →
ancient13–20.0217%21 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0317%21 Jun →
ancient13–60.0612%20 Jun →
inferno13–20.0125%20 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0217%20 Jun →
inferno10–130.0219%20 Jun →
cache6–130.0111%16 Jun →
dust28–130.0214%16 Jun →
nuke13–110.0626%16 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.018%14 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0019%14 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0215%14 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0021%14 Jun →
anubis7–130.0114%14 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.029%14 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0013%14 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0115%14 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.108%14 Jun →
nuke13–80.0340%10 Jun →
ancient13–80.0834%10 Jun →
ancient13–100.039%10 Jun →
cache11–130.0114%10 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0218%9 Jun →
dust27–130.0518%9 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0420%9 Jun →
inferno13–110.0215%6 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0314%5 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0314%5 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0022%5 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0310%5 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0226%4 Jun →
dust214–160.0127%3 Jun →
anubis13–20.027%3 Jun →
anubis19–170.0213%3 Jun →
inferno9–130.0224%2 Jun →
inferno13–100.0220%2 Jun →
inferno7–130.029%1 Jun →
inferno4–130.0513%1 Jun →
cache3–130.0810%1 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0211%31 May →
ancient13–11-0.0516%31 May →
nuke13–110.0326%31 May →
nuke13–80.0321%31 May →
inferno3–130.0123%26 May →
ancient7–13-0.0113%26 May →
overpass6–130.0218%24 May →
ancient16–130.1116%24 May →
nuke13–60.0322%24 May →
dust225–28-0.0518%22 May →
overpass9–13-0.0616%22 May →
cache10–130.0015%22 May →
inferno9–13-0.0215%22 May →
inferno10–130.0616%22 May →
overpass7–130.0130%19 May →
nuke11–13-0.0415%19 May →
inferno13–100.0016%18 May →
inferno16–130.028%18 May →
cache13–11-0.0313%18 May →
ancient8–13-0.097%18 May →
nuke13–60.0719%16 May →
nuke13–100.0019%14 May →
ancient10–13-0.0419%14 May →
anubis13–100.019%14 May →
ancient13–11-0.0511%14 May →
inferno11–13-0.0116%14 May →
ancient13–11-0.0312%14 May →
inferno7–13-0.0910%14 May →
ancient13–9-0.0017%14 May →
ancient11–130.0316%13 May →
inferno13–9-0.0333%13 May →
ancient13–70.0918%12 May →
ancient8–130.0816%12 May →
inferno16–140.0421%12 May →
inferno13–80.0128%12 May →
anubis13–90.0612%11 May →
nuke5–130.0222%11 May →
inferno13–10-0.0028%10 May →
ancient25–22-0.0215%10 May →
cache13–90.009%10 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.