5.

5. — CS2 Stats

BB76561199157137516[U:1:1196871788]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,976Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (53 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,328 → 2,328
+2Tracked matches · now 1,976
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,328 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 6 observations
2,3282,328peak 2,32829 Aug23 Sept
2,328Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
83Days played since 2024-12-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,328
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG5.30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,328csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning65
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–56Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.7
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+5.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 17 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 13 Mar →
367msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 10 Feb →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 7 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2710–1737%-0.00
anubisD237–1630%-0.01
dust2A1911–858%0.01
nukeS128–467%0.01
infernoA74–357%-0.00
ancientD61–517%0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
cache—10–10%-0.01
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,894Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
84.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage75154%1.1617.3
Dust241948%1.1716.9
Anubis31950%1.0616.0
Ancient21041%1.0616.3
Inferno9942%1.1416.7
Vertigo9163%1.1116.0
Nuke8250%1.0315.8
Overpass4448%1.0115.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
92.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
599msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
61.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
10.95HE damage / grenade
6.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0241%7 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0629%25 Jul →
mirage7–130.0138%21 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0122%9 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0114%13 Jun →
mirage0–10-0.0932%7 Jun →
nuke13–30.0219%7 Jun →
anubis11–130.0431%6 Jun →
mirage13–40.0631%26 May →
mirage13–6-0.0327%26 May →
overpass13–8-0.0418%24 May →
mirage13–80.0323%24 May →
mirage8–13-0.0226%18 May →
nuke16–120.0213%16 May →
anubis1–13-0.0434%16 May →
overpass13–10-0.0120%15 May →
nuke13–110.0826%14 May →
mirage13–70.0321%14 May →
anubis13–6-0.0324%13 May →
ancient7–13-0.0228%13 May →
mirage13–50.0735%4 May →
anubis11–13-0.0127%4 May →
mirage14–160.0418%28 Apr →
ancient10–130.0730%23 Apr →
dust213–110.0526%23 Apr →
inferno13–110.0127%23 Apr →
mirage13–110.0419%22 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0717%15 Apr →
anubis19–150.0021%14 Apr →
anubis16–14-0.0230%28 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0215%26 Mar →
inferno13–40.0125%24 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0018%23 Mar →
mirage7–130.0125%21 Mar →
dust213–100.0233%15 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0018%14 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0450%13 Mar →
dust210–130.0033%12 Mar →
ancient13–100.0218%8 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0318%4 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.058%3 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0028%26 Feb →
anubis3–13-0.0717%23 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0223%16 Feb →
nuke16–130.0530%15 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.066%15 Feb →
anubis25–230.0022%15 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0121%14 Feb →
nuke13–80.0710%14 Feb →
dust210–130.0422%13 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0220%12 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0012%10 Feb →
anubis8–130.0013%31 Jan →
dust211–13-0.0622%30 Jan →
dust213–110.0523%23 Jan →
dust213–100.1430%17 Jan →
dust29–130.0513%3 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0423%22 Dec →
mirage13–16-0.0014%16 Dec →
inferno8–130.0322%29 Nov →
mirage0–11-0.0528%22 Jul →
inferno13–90.0419%28 Jun →
anubis8–130.0213%27 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0212%14 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0424%30 May →
mirage13–50.0918%26 May →
mirage4–130.0115%9 May →
ancient20–22-0.0118%4 May →
anubis13–9-0.0513%13 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0127%8 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0227%6 Apr →
dust25–12-0.0315%5 Apr →
dust213–60.0124%3 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0312%3 Apr →
mirage13–16-0.0311%22 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0518%14 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0418%2 Mar →
mirage13–50.0520%27 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0521%10 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0415%4 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0127%4 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0415%3 Feb →
inferno13–7-0.0311%1 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0320%1 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0225%19 Jan →
dust222–18-0.0224%18 Jan →
anubis7–13-0.0311%17 Jan →
train8–130.0320%17 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0312%15 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0615%14 Jan →
dust213–90.0321%14 Jan →
vertigo11–13-0.0613%10 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.0123%7 Jan →
anubis14–16-0.0119%6 Jan →
anubis6–13-0.0212%5 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0215%4 Jan →
anubis13–80.0724%29 Dec →
vertigo13–50.0335%27 Dec →
dust212–160.0224%24 Dec →
ancient11–130.0027%18 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.