Jorma-Tapio

Jorma-Tapio — CS2 Stats

76561199147840788[U:1:1187575060]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,432Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,545 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJorma-TapioFACEITLevel 6 · 1,545 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning49
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.9
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time556ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 3 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 20 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 3 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213959%-0.01
ancientA1810856%0.00
mirageD1651131%-0.02
anubisA138562%0.00
dust2C104640%-0.00
infernoC104640%0.02
overpassD62433%0.00
cache42250%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,341Matches
48%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
74.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43543%0.9013.9
Ancient40553%0.9614.8
Nuke39854%0.9915.0
Anubis34950%0.9614.7
Dust224443%0.8713.6
Inferno14846%0.8713.8
Overpass8848%1.0014.7
Train8450%0.9015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
4.31HE damage / grenade
4.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4153 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0225%3 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0618%2 Sept
dust212–16-0.0122%18 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0511%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0010%14 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0310%28 Jul
overpass9–70.0128%27 Jun
nuke1–9-0.1417%27 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0020%26 Jun
dust213–16-0.0520%24 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0916%24 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0019%24 Jun
ancient13–90.0111%23 Jun
ancient13–70.0517%16 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0610%10 Jun
nuke13–60.0622%8 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0619%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0218%7 Jun
ancient13–80.0119%7 Jun
nuke13–80.006%6 Jun
mirage13–80.0616%27 May
ancient3–13-0.0618%27 May
nuke10–13-0.0115%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0617%26 May
anubis13–90.0815%22 May
anubis13–11-0.0317%20 May
mirage11–130.0112%20 May
mirage13–10-0.0111%20 May
mirage10–13-0.079%20 May
ancient10–13-0.046%19 May
anubis16–120.0612%19 May
mirage2–13-0.0914%19 May
cache13–70.0110%12 May
mirage12–16-0.0111%12 May
cache11–13-0.0310%11 May
anubis6–13-0.0613%8 May
ancient1–13-0.0621%3 May
cache13–8-0.087%29 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0326%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0127%27 Apr
cache14–16-0.0412%27 Apr
dust25–130.0510%27 Apr
mirage8–3-0.0229%27 Apr
nuke16–140.0226%24 Apr
ancient11–130.0116%22 Apr
ancient13–2-0.0524%22 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0413%21 Apr
ancient13–80.0118%20 Apr
ancient16–140.0814%20 Apr
inferno7–90.0224%15 Apr
overpass9–10.2218%15 Apr
vertigo9–50.079%15 Apr
dust213–110.0113%15 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0424%15 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0214%12 Apr
dust213–40.0611%8 Apr
ancient13–70.049%8 Apr
inferno9–70.0915%6 Apr
dust216–13-0.0314%6 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0115%5 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0018%5 Apr
inferno9–7-0.1029%2 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0120%2 Apr
ancient11–130.0329%2 Apr
nuke12–160.0012%1 Apr
inferno6–90.1019%1 Apr
overpass4–9-0.0514%31 Mar
inferno1–9-0.0710%31 Mar
nuke5–9-0.1233%31 Mar
nuke9–70.0319%31 Mar
nuke6–9-0.0221%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0216%31 Mar
anubis13–110.0410%26 Mar
mirage2–13-0.1111%25 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0310%22 Mar
anubis8–130.0114%21 Mar
dust213–80.0217%20 Mar
mirage3–130.0141%20 Mar
dust27–13-0.0420%18 Mar
nuke13–160.0021%16 Mar
nuke16–140.0113%14 Mar
ancient13–50.028%13 Mar
ancient13–20.0614%13 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0220%12 Mar
nuke13–70.0216%12 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0116%12 Mar
dust29–13-0.0219%11 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0919%10 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0122%10 Mar
ancient8–130.0022%9 Mar
anubis13–50.0427%9 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0119%7 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0514%4 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0120%3 Mar
anubis13–10.0912%3 Mar
inferno9–10.3622%3 Mar
nuke13–70.0516%27 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0310%27 Feb
mirage13–50.1315%26 Feb
mirage7–130.0015%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →