Asian Denkel

Asian Denkel — CS2 Stats

AQ76561199147344699[U:1:1187078971]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

945Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.7 LearningSupport
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 945
+7.2ppWin rate · 32.1% → 39.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 11 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,031 +1,870 11 Jan14 Jun · 19 days played
11,16113,219peak 13,21911 Jan14 Jun
13,562Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-01-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim25
Positioning28
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39565Last 10039%Win rateLWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim2.5
Utility4.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.5
Positioning2.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact1.4

Composite 2.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time636ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy10.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 7 Aug
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · overpass, 22 Jan
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 11 Sept
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 14 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 56% over 18anubisWeakest map · 21% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24111346%-0.06
anubisD1941521%-0.05
overpassA1810856%-0.06
nukeD1551033%-0.07
ancientB126650%-0.05
train4040%-0.04
mirage31233%-0.08
cache2020%-0.08
vertigo21150%0.01
agency110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.9%Headshot accuracy
26.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.4%Spray accuracy
67.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
632msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
7.22HE damage / grenade
11.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.861% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3815 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9574% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.089%11 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0612%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.037%11 Sept
nuke8–13-0.120%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.108%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0313%7 Aug
ancient13–30.129%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.048%23 Jul
nuke3–13-0.107%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0914%23 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0912%15 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0419%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0418%15 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0421%15 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0710%3 Jul
anubis9–13-0.029%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.079%14 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0821%14 Jun
overpass13–2-0.095%14 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0511%16 May
inferno15–15-0.0811%11 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0611%21 Mar
inferno15–150.0119%21 Mar
anubis13–3-0.0311%21 Mar
ancient13–9-0.068%21 Mar
inferno13–11-0.113%21 Mar
anubis6–13-0.079%21 Mar
overpass13–6-0.066%20 Mar
vertigo9–40.0912%14 Mar
overpass13–7-0.077%27 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0414%27 Feb
nuke7–13-0.1116%27 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0713%27 Feb
inferno10–13-0.067%23 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0913%23 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0320%20 Feb
overpass9–13-0.068%15 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0615%13 Feb
inferno15–15-0.078%11 Feb
anubis9–13-0.058%11 Feb
ancient13–4-0.048%11 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0212%7 Feb
inferno13–30.0414%7 Feb
overpass15–15-0.0314%7 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0416%7 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0816%7 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0420%7 Feb
inferno13–6-0.045%7 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0517%6 Feb
overpass16–12-0.0610%6 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0911%2 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0114%2 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0714%2 Feb
ancient13–160.0111%1 Feb
anubis10–13-0.049%1 Feb
overpass12–16-0.094%1 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0625%1 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0912%31 Jan
ancient4–13-0.070%31 Jan
anubis13–80.019%31 Jan
ancient16–13-0.083%31 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0511%31 Jan
mirage6–13-0.1314%31 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0114%31 Jan
nuke7–13-0.105%31 Jan
ancient13–4-0.105%31 Jan
anubis9–13-0.113%31 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0410%31 Jan
overpass3–13-0.053%31 Jan
anubis8–13-0.082%24 Jan
inferno2–13-0.147%23 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0323%23 Jan
ancient5–13-0.1115%23 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0228%22 Jan
inferno13–5-0.0820%22 Jan
vertigo9–13-0.079%21 Jan
agency13–10-0.034%21 Jan
anubis2–13-0.0510%21 Jan
train15–15-0.037%18 Jan
overpass13–90.026%18 Jan
nuke9–13-0.086%16 Jan
inferno2–13-0.099%16 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0312%16 Jan
inferno16–14-0.0415%16 Jan
inferno10–13-0.103%15 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0310%15 Jan
train3–13-0.070%15 Jan
nuke13–11-0.088%15 Jan
overpass9–13-0.087%15 Jan
train10–13-0.057%15 Jan
train4–13-0.0213%14 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0414%14 Jan
overpass1–13-0.114%13 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0916%13 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0812%12 Jan
inferno13–4-0.0010%12 Jan
overpass13–2-0.0217%12 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0413%11 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0020%11 Jan
overpass10–13-0.1025%11 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →