S h y r e — CS2 Stats

76561199133869659[U:1:1173603931]✓ No bans

2,026Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,800Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9393 of 30997 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,800Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,800
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,200 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGS h y r eFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,800 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning46
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45469Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression5.0
Utility3.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.6
Utility3.8
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time596ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 7–13
132Biggest win — boulder
4Longest win streak
1211In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%-0.01
mirageC145936%-0.02
nukeA117464%0.00
cacheC94544%-0.02
ancientC73443%-0.00
anubisD61517%-0.06
trainD62433%0.06
vertigoC52340%-0.01
inferno4040%-0.03
fachwerk42250%0.01
shelter42250%-0.03
boulder32167%0.01
overpass21150%-0.01
office1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
65%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
77.0ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2650%0.8515.3
Mirage580%0.8115.0
Anubis475%1.2317.5
Inferno367%0.9215.3
Ancient10%1.1919.0
Nuke1100%0.538.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.3%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
580msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
6.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4115 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1151% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0212%29 Aug
dust213–70.0123%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0421%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0625%28 Aug
cache13–3-0.0833%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0218%27 Aug
dust213–110.0035%27 Aug
nuke13–100.0324%27 Aug
anubis13–110.0314%27 Aug
mirage13–30.0422%27 Aug
ancient3–130.0030%27 Aug
dust213–8-0.0412%26 Aug
dust213–50.0424%26 Aug
nuke13–6-0.058%25 Aug
vertigo11–130.0222%25 Aug
dust213–60.0731%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0528%24 Aug
dust211–130.0221%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.0227%24 Aug
cache4–13-0.0222%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0723%23 Aug
mirage8–130.0625%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0235%21 Aug
cache7–13-0.0216%20 Aug
dust213–110.0031%20 Aug
train3–3-0.0114%15 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0130%15 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0514%15 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.1243%12 Aug
dust212–120.0621%12 Aug
cache12–12-0.0129%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0333%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0626%9 Aug
nuke13–30.060%9 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0445%6 Aug
train9–130.1133%6 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0215%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0724%28 Jul
train12–120.0523%28 Jul
train13–90.0423%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0118%25 Jul
dust21–13-0.0820%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.1050%22 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0126%22 Jul
nuke13–10-0.016%22 Jul
ancient9–7-0.0413%22 Jul
train13–70.1110%21 Jul
dust212–12-0.0419%21 Jul
train11–130.0213%20 Jul
dust213–70.0628%20 Jul
mirage2–13-0.054%17 Jul
cache4–13-0.0416%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.043%15 Jul
cache13–40.0027%15 Jul
dust212–12-0.0615%14 Jul
boulder4–13-0.0119%14 Jul
fachwerk12–120.0237%14 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0816%13 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0427%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0367%13 Jul
shelter4–13-0.1029%12 Jul
fachwerk13–4-0.010%12 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0122%11 Jul
shelter13–10-0.0418%11 Jul
fachwerk13–60.0134%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0223%11 Jul
boulder13–11-0.0327%10 Jul
dust213–110.0336%10 Jul
fachwerk9–130.0116%9 Jul
boulder13–20.0817%9 Jul
shelter13–40.0522%9 Jul
shelter1–7-0.0125%9 Jul
vertigo13–30.0812%8 Jul
cache8–130.0123%8 Jul
nuke13–80.0626%8 Jul
vertigo3–13-0.0027%6 Jul
dust213–90.007%6 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0627%6 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0718%6 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0626%5 Jul
dust213–70.0338%4 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0013%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0629%4 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0031%4 Jul
inferno7–130.0119%4 Jul
dust213–110.0023%4 Jul
ancient13–40.1525%3 Jul
dust213–110.0325%3 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0721%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0515%2 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0423%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0612%1 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0610%30 Jun
cache13–90.0224%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0533%30 Jun
office7–13-0.1013%30 Jun
anubis5–13-0.109%29 Jun
nuke7–130.17100%29 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0415%25 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0417%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →