ka1Che

ka1Che — CS2 Stats

76561199130788100[U:1:1170522372]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,671Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,813 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,671 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 1 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,597 +1,013 7 Jan19 Jan · 4 days played
25,58426,597peak 26,5977 Jan19 Jan
26,597Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,813Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2026-01-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,813
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 187 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGka1CheFACEITLevel 10 · 2,813 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,813csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning58
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57394Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −91ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 423ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time535ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–11 · train, 9 Apr
61%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 10 May
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 85% over 13ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1710759%0.02
ancientD1441029%0.01
anubisA149564%0.01
nukeS1311285%0.01
infernoS128467%0.04
mirageC125742%0.03
cacheC73443%0.05
vertigo32167%-0.00
train32167%0.07
overpass21150%0.05
shelter1010%0.09
office110100%0.07
agency110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,212Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
89.6ADR
65%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20855%1.2819.0
Anubis15453%1.2618.6
Ancient13347%1.1917.7
Dust210550%1.1416.4
Inferno7856%1.2318.3
Nuke6058%1.1017.9
Train2357%1.3020.5
Vertigo2045%1.1916.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.8%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
526msReaction time
26.7%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.13HE damage / grenade
7.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4202 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0538%14 Sept
ancient13–90.0923%14 Sept
anubis16–130.0725%9 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0332%8 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0033%8 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0419%8 Sept
dust211–13-0.0324%29 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0311%29 Aug
anubis13–70.0432%26 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0133%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0316%25 Aug
inferno13–40.0441%16 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0228%16 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0321%14 Aug
vertigo13–10.0218%14 Aug
vertigo13–50.0111%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0832%14 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0326%13 Aug
nuke13–30.0816%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0324%11 Aug
cache12–120.0429%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0417%8 Aug
cache13–80.0435%8 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0123%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0020%6 Aug
shelter5–130.0942%3 Aug
inferno13–70.1243%2 Aug
cache13–90.0834%2 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0521%28 Jul
mirage8–130.0236%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0313%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0224%21 Jul
dust28–130.0721%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0527%16 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0226%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0326%24 Jun
ancient11–130.0535%10 Jun
mirage5–130.1045%8 Jun
dust28–13-0.0620%6 Jun
inferno8–80.0728%31 May
ancient6–13-0.0237%21 May
nuke8–130.0728%20 May
mirage3–130.0133%20 May
nuke13–6-0.0233%14 May
cache12–120.1061%10 May
cache10–130.0228%10 May
cache11–13-0.0033%10 May
mirage10–130.0220%6 May
ancient6–13-0.0315%24 Apr
dust216–14-0.0226%24 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0117%18 Apr
nuke13–60.0929%16 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0243%16 Apr
inferno13–20.0421%16 Apr
dust213–50.0629%16 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0924%16 Apr
dust27–130.0421%12 Apr
anubis13–50.0618%9 Apr
train13–110.1434%9 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0324%31 Mar
anubis19–170.0226%31 Mar
dust213–80.0619%23 Mar
dust213–80.0447%22 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0425%21 Mar
ancient9–130.0727%12 Mar
mirage13–90.0030%8 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0228%8 Mar
nuke13–80.0633%8 Mar
office13–70.0739%7 Mar
dust211–13-0.0333%7 Mar
dust213–20.0728%25 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0230%25 Feb
inferno13–80.0626%23 Feb
inferno13–40.0917%23 Feb
inferno13–90.0817%18 Feb
anubis13–110.0523%18 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0732%16 Feb
dust213–30.0821%11 Feb
dust213–30.0636%9 Feb
inferno10–130.0420%4 Feb
overpass13–40.0442%31 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0431%28 Jan
anubis13–100.0415%21 Jan
dust213–100.0337%19 Jan
dust213–9-0.0129%15 Jan
nuke13–40.1034%12 Jan
mirage11–130.0824%12 Jan
ancient2–130.0624%10 Jan
agency13–90.1128%10 Jan
nuke13–3-0.0328%7 Jan
ancient13–70.0724%3 Jan
overpass8–130.0722%3 Jan
dust211–13-0.049%3 Jan
train8–13-0.0314%3 Jan
dust27–130.0530%2 Jan
nuke13–9-0.0325%1 Jan
train13–100.0936%1 Jan
mirage12–120.1127%1 Jan
mirage13–90.1027%1 Jan
dust28–2-0.0333%1 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →