-D_n_J-

-D_n_J- — CS2 Stats

BW76561199110886966[U:1:1150621238]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

569Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,267Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84580 of 225842 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,410 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 569 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 27 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,267 +2,723 27 Mar13 Sept · 31 days played
15,31919,999peak 19,99927 Mar13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,410 +0 1 Sept13 Sept · 3 observations
1,4101,410peak 1,4101 Sept13 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,410Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-03-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,410
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 121 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 732 below peak (19,999)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 733 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-D_n_J-FACEITLevel 8 · 1,410 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,267 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,410csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning55
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51409Last 10051%Win rateWWWWTLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 401 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.5
Utility3.6
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time617ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+7.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 14 Jul
67%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · anubis, 8 Jul
445msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 15 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 8 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA44251957%0.02
dust2C1871139%-0.00
anubisA138562%0.01
ancientB136746%-0.02
cache42250%0.10
inferno43175%0.00
nuke2020%0.03
vertigo1010%0.14
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
85.0ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3456%1.1817.0
Dust21759%1.3316.5
Ancient944%1.1517.4
Inferno743%1.1415.6
Nuke520%1.2013.8
Overpass560%1.0617.2
Anubis1100%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
90.8%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
621msReaction time
42.7%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
4.98HE damage / grenade
8.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0940%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0342%11 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0521%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0128%7 Sept
mirage12–120.1039%28 Aug
dust24–130.0129%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0336%2 Aug
mirage16–140.0521%2 Aug
mirage13–160.0348%1 Aug
ancient5–130.0117%27 Jul
ancient14–160.0120%19 Jul
anubis13–50.0234%19 Jul
anubis13–20.0324%17 Jul
mirage0–13-0.100%17 Jul
mirage13–20.0237%17 Jul
dust28–13-0.0528%17 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0342%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0637%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0237%16 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0223%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0422%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0030%16 Jul
anubis9–130.0124%14 Jul
cache13–20.2223%14 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0229%14 Jul
mirage13–80.1041%13 Jul
cache13–30.1029%13 Jul
mirage11–130.0343%12 Jul
mirage8–130.0429%11 Jul
anubis12–120.0021%11 Jul
mirage13–40.0539%8 Jul
mirage7–6-0.0145%8 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0618%8 Jul
anubis13–20.0427%8 Jul
anubis10–0-0.0067%8 Jul
dust213–110.0935%7 Jul
vertigo12–120.1426%7 Jul
mirage3–130.0132%6 Jul
mirage12–120.1029%6 Jul
cache12–120.0737%23 May
cache10–13-0.0123%20 May
anubis7–130.0327%20 May
mirage13–60.0337%15 May
mirage13–5-0.0424%14 May
ancient15–15-0.0420%13 May
mirage13–1-0.0167%8 May
anubis14–16-0.0718%8 May
inferno13–100.0238%8 May
mirage13–8-0.0122%7 May
anubis13–30.0321%7 May
mirage13–90.0429%7 May
dust212–12-0.0258%7 May
nuke9–130.0331%5 May
dust214–16-0.0330%28 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0021%28 Apr
mirage15–150.0430%28 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0516%26 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0821%26 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0122%22 Apr
dust213–50.0635%22 Apr
dust29–130.0333%22 Apr
dust210–13-0.0328%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0928%21 Apr
dust213–60.0134%16 Apr
mirage10–130.0119%16 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0512%16 Apr
mirage11–130.0329%16 Apr
dust28–130.0223%14 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0023%14 Apr
mirage14–160.0631%10 Apr
ancient9–130.0420%10 Apr
anubis13–90.0822%6 Apr
inferno13–90.0421%3 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0231%3 Apr
dust211–130.0126%3 Apr
dust213–5-0.0425%2 Apr
mirage13–80.0931%2 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0323%2 Apr
mirage7–130.0124%2 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0219%2 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0412%2 Apr
mirage13–70.0428%2 Apr
mirage13–80.0228%1 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0518%1 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0121%1 Apr
mirage13–60.0520%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0723%31 Mar
dust213–10-0.0123%31 Mar
dust210–13-0.0217%30 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0728%30 Mar
nuke9–130.0231%30 Mar
mirage13–50.1122%30 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0020%30 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0424%29 Mar
dust22–13-0.0630%29 Mar
dust215–15-0.0716%29 Mar
mirage13–90.0116%27 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0417%27 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0516%27 Mar
dust213–90.0523%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →