0n5ku

0n5ku — CS2 Stats

FI76561199107703923[U:1:1147438195]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,633Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,739Purple band · top ~25.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,345 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,739 +1,354 3 Apr – 10 Oct · 29 days played
13,49317,092peak 17,0923 Apr10 Oct
17,092Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,345Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-04-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,345
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,353 below peak (17,092)
  • -581 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,872 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,261 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0n5kuFACEITLevel 6 · 1,345 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,739 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,345csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning43
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time665ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 18 Apr →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · vertigo, 4 Apr →
492msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 6 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L8Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2211–1150%-0.02
nukeB178–947%-0.00
infernoC125–742%0.01
anubisA116–555%0.01
cacheC104–640%-0.01
vertigoC94–544%0.01
ancientC83–538%-0.01
dust2—40–40%-0.03
overpass—41–325%-0.01
sanctum—21–150%0.03
poseidon—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,857Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
77.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44646%0.9414.8
Ancient29452%1.0016.0
Nuke25056%1.0015.2
Anubis19748%0.9615.2
Inferno15445%0.8213.5
Dust211144%0.9514.6
Vertigo8164%1.0215.7
Overpass6067%0.9415.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
664msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.51HE damage / grenade
3.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.6927 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1462% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.058%10 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0219%9 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0319%8 Oct →
anubis7–130.0613%7 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0113%27 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.050%27 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0613%25 Sept →
nuke13–20.0119%25 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.1013%25 Sept →
cache13–30.0217%20 Sept →
mirage3–130.0220%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0320%11 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0415%11 Sept →
nuke10–130.029%5 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0628%30 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0722%22 Aug →
vertigo13–40.1417%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.0617%19 Aug →
inferno8–130.0921%17 Aug →
nuke8–130.0316%16 Aug →
vertigo9–70.0719%16 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0120%15 Aug →
mirage13–100.0310%15 Aug →
inferno13–70.1220%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0115%14 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0221%14 Aug →
mirage10–130.0416%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0619%7 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0413%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0124%7 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0614%7 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0315%2 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0510%2 Aug →
cache13–160.0316%31 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0915%31 Jul →
mirage13–70.0116%31 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0222%24 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0111%19 Jul →
anubis10–00.058%19 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0020%19 Jul →
anubis13–60.0214%19 Jul →
cache9–13-0.026%18 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0316%18 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0520%17 Jul →
anubis13–90.068%17 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.115%16 Jul →
cache13–110.0514%16 Jul →
anubis13–80.0819%16 Jul →
cache13–100.0115%5 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0315%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0021%4 Jul →
nuke13–110.0113%4 Jul →
cache19–16-0.0118%3 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0114%3 Jul →
overpass7–130.0215%3 Jul →
inferno12–160.0630%3 Jul →
ancient2–130.0710%29 Jun →
nuke13–110.018%29 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0726%28 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0122%23 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.148%22 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0827%14 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.1017%12 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0517%29 May →
cache11–130.0028%29 May →
vertigo9–13-0.0217%29 May →
overpass6–90.0623%16 May →
inferno9–13-0.0521%14 May →
nuke8–8-0.0729%14 May →
mirage13–10-0.0432%9 May →
nuke9–13-0.0319%3 May →
cache2–13-0.0821%30 Apr →
cache4–13-0.050%30 Apr →
mirage13–40.0835%25 Apr →
vertigo4–9-0.0223%20 Apr →
sanctum7–9-0.0418%20 Apr →
vertigo13–90.0222%20 Apr →
vertigo9–60.0328%20 Apr →
inferno1–13-0.0713%19 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0213%19 Apr →
mirage13–110.0313%18 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0215%18 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0319%18 Apr →
inferno13–40.0616%18 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0315%18 Apr →
nuke9–20.1916%18 Apr →
mirage13–80.1015%17 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0129%17 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0517%6 Apr →
anubis13–20.1012%6 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0018%4 Apr →
vertigo4–13-0.0520%4 Apr →
inferno9–50.0332%4 Apr →
overpass9–00.0013%4 Apr →
ancient11–130.0318%4 Apr →
vertigo8–8-0.1036%4 Apr →
sanctum9–10.1120%4 Apr →
dust20–5-0.0820%3 Apr →
overpass1–13-0.1110%3 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.