fen1xs11 — CS2 Stats

76561199106846053[U:1:1146580325]

1,633Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,000Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning51

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression6.1

Utility4.9

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.1

Utility4.9

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time590ms−56ms

first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%−5.8%

first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 7–3

13–0Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

L4Current streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 21ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	43	21–22	49%	0.02
dust2	A	21	13–8	62%	0.02
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.00
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

409Matches

49%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

74.8ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	142	58%	1.26	16.7
Mirage	131	47%	1.03	16.2
Inferno	52	40%	0.99	13.7
Ancient	42	45%	0.96	14.7
Nuke	14	50%	0.93	13.7
Anubis	13	23%	0.83	12.9
Overpass	8	25%	0.79	12.4
Cache	6	67%	0.85	13.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.7%Spray accuracy

73.9%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

576msReaction time

26.0%T opening success

50.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

6.96HE damage / grenade

7.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4651 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.0294% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	-0.01	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	25%	25 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.00	18%	24 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	40%	23 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.04	21%	23 Aug →
inferno	22–20	-0.00	22%	23 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.02	7%	22 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.00	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.03	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	37%	17 Aug →
mirage	16–19	-0.02	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	31%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	15%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	28%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	30%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	12%	8 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	38%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	26%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.11	22%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.10	40%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	25%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.15	33%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.13	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–3	0.18	32%	30 Jul →
dust2	21–25	-0.04	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.06	50%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–4	0.03	22%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.05	10%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	32%	25 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	100%	24 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.01	27%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	23%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	26%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	36%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	31%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.09	24%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.06	55%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.07	40%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.10	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.13	26%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	35%	21 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.07	24%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.05	36%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	18%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	27%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.05	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	25%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	46%	17 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	11%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	14%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	36%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	25%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	29%	16 Jul →
mirage	1–6	0.02	60%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.11	26%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.06	17%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.00	33%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	34%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	36%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	39%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	34%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–4	0.11	26%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	35%	11 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	28%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.10	25%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	24%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	31%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.05	31%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	20%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	25%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	43%	9 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	20%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	39%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	28%	4 Jul →
overpass	8–13	-0.00	18%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	38%	4 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	23%	4 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	27%	4 Jul →
inferno	1–13	0.01	38%	3 Jul →