Zerk

Zerk — CS2 Stats

US76561199099450114[U:1:1139184386]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,992Tracked matches56%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,723Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86977 of 252098 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,279 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,723 +723 30 Aug – 14 Oct · 14 days played
18,18320,123peak 20,12330 Aug14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,279 +0 30 Aug – 22 Sept · 2 observations
1,2791,279peak 1,27930 Aug22 Sept
20,123Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,279Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,279
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 400 below peak (20,123)
  • -277 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 277 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZerkFACEITLevel 6 · 1,279 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,723 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,279csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning54
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–39–7Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time603ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 12–12 · office, 21 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 29 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 6 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2414–1058%0.01
nukeC187–1139%0.00
ancientS1410–471%0.02
cacheB137–654%0.00
mirageB105–550%-0.00
anubisA106–460%0.00
infernoB63–350%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.05
train—21–150%0.03
office—10–10%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

509Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11747%0.9314.2
Ancient9453%0.9514.4
Dust28257%0.9914.6
Nuke6455%1.0415.2
Anubis5046%0.9514.5
Inferno4457%1.0915.1
Overpass3339%0.9514.0
Cache1656%1.0415.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
600msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.74HE damage / grenade
16.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–130.0011%15 Oct →
ancient13–70.0224%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0115%15 Oct →
dust213–30.0221%14 Oct →
nuke9–130.0122%14 Oct →
cache13–90.0314%14 Oct →
nuke8–130.0026%14 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0518%14 Oct →
cache12–120.0522%13 Oct →
cache13–70.0011%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0219%13 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0114%12 Oct →
mirage6–130.0715%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0617%11 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0630%11 Oct →
mirage13–100.0116%11 Oct →
inferno13–10.0815%11 Oct →
nuke13–30.0310%10 Oct →
dust27–130.0411%10 Oct →
overpass12–120.019%9 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0215%9 Oct →
train11–130.0215%9 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0813%8 Oct →
nuke12–120.0722%8 Oct →
overpass13–30.0924%8 Oct →
dust213–40.0612%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0622%8 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0314%8 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0724%8 Oct →
dust27–130.0919%7 Oct →
anubis2–120.0132%7 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0012%7 Oct →
ancient13–80.0126%7 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0523%6 Oct →
nuke13–30.0014%6 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0717%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0533%6 Oct →
nuke2–60.0224%6 Oct →
train13–60.0325%6 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0126%6 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0017%6 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0415%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0216%5 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0117%5 Oct →
cache13–70.0723%4 Oct →
dust213–110.0617%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.0215%3 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0018%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0719%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0314%3 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0313%3 Oct →
ancient4–130.0013%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0119%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0230%2 Oct →
ancient13–20.0918%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0122%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0221%1 Oct →
ancient10–10.0811%1 Oct →
anubis13–80.0814%1 Oct →
dust212–120.0213%30 Sept →
nuke13–100.0321%30 Sept →
ancient8–00.0619%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0520%30 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0314%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0333%29 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0212%29 Sept →
inferno13–50.0717%28 Sept →
ancient6–00.0627%28 Sept →
anubis13–30.1022%28 Sept →
nuke9–130.0513%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0312%27 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0616%27 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0516%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0611%25 Sept →
ancient25–23-0.0016%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0512%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0514%25 Sept →
ancient9–130.079%24 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0713%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0716%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0123%24 Sept →
anubis13–20.038%24 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0214%24 Sept →
cache13–80.0218%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0312%23 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0516%23 Sept →
dust214–160.0618%23 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0214%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%22 Sept →
anubis13–50.0720%22 Sept →
dust211–130.0413%22 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0514%22 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.048%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0224%22 Sept →
nuke10–130.0219%22 Sept →
office12–120.1415%21 Sept →
nuke5–130.0124%21 Sept →
inferno13–50.0216%21 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0518%21 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0113%21 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.