sorensen

sorensen — CS2 Stats

DK76561199098864212[U:1:1138598484]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,769Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,702 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,702 → 2,702
+8Tracked matches · now 1,769
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 26 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,239 +2,777 1 Mar5 Jun · 11 days played
25,46229,117peak 29,1171 Mar5 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,702 +0 28 Aug15 Sept · 4 observations
2,7022,702peak 2,70228 Aug15 Sept
29,223Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,702Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,702
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 298 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsorensenFACEITLevel 10 · 2,702 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,702csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 458ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time526ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 12 Mar
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 5 Mar
328msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 10 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 6ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B36181850%0.01
anubisB189950%0.00
ancientC146843%0.02
infernoB115645%0.04
mirageC73443%0.03
cacheS660100%0.03
nuke41325%0.02
overpass330100%0.06
vertigo1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,251Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.2ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust227855%1.2016.6
Mirage26152%1.1216.4
Ancient22549%1.1817.3
Anubis19752%1.2317.6
Inferno13756%1.2016.4
Nuke4749%1.3517.1
Overpass3551%1.0816.6
Vertigo2264%1.6519.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
519msReaction time
43.3%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.94HE damage / grenade
6.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.2871% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0740%12 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0123%12 Sept
anubis11–130.0133%7 Sept
ancient19–170.0116%1 Sept
ancient13–70.0426%29 Aug
ancient7–130.0116%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0320%27 Aug
cache13–60.0317%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0632%17 Aug
dust212–120.0228%15 Aug
dust213–90.0327%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0021%15 Aug
dust22–8-0.069%12 Aug
ancient0–3-0.0817%12 Aug
dust213–11-0.0518%12 Aug
dust213–60.0225%12 Aug
anubis8–130.0434%11 Aug
cache8–40.0322%11 Aug
dust213–10.1037%11 Aug
ancient13–90.0526%11 Aug
cache13–30.0826%7 Aug
dust213–100.0916%7 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0415%26 Jul
cache16–140.0428%26 Jul
anubis13–30.0514%26 Jul
cache13–6-0.0220%26 Jul
dust29–130.1321%25 Jul
anubis13–100.0216%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0524%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0424%11 Jul
dust216–12-0.0319%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.029%6 Jul
ancient10–130.0125%2 Jul
dust24–13-0.0322%30 Jun
anubis19–150.0012%29 Jun
inferno13–160.0331%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0230%26 Jun
dust213–110.0516%24 Jun
vertigo8–80.0026%20 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0525%19 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0829%18 Jun
anubis6–130.0121%12 Jun
ancient13–80.0622%5 Jun
dust26–13-0.0016%5 Jun
nuke13–110.0535%5 Jun
mirage16–120.0631%5 Jun
inferno9–40.1527%5 Jun
inferno7–90.0120%5 Jun
inferno8–130.0414%5 Jun
dust212–120.0327%5 Jun
mirage13–110.1622%5 Jun
ancient13–70.0112%29 May
inferno11–13-0.0720%27 May
anubis13–10-0.0117%25 May
cache13–100.0121%25 May
ancient6–130.0126%18 May
anubis13–9-0.0128%16 May
dust213–100.0129%15 May
anubis11–13-0.0030%4 May
ancient8–130.0331%1 May
inferno13–40.0312%1 May
dust27–130.0026%1 May
dust26–13-0.0128%30 Apr
inferno13–90.0241%28 Apr
dust213–6-0.0318%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0415%11 Apr
nuke5–130.0614%6 Apr
dust29–130.0123%2 Apr
dust210–13-0.0733%2 Apr
inferno13–100.0722%2 Apr
mirage9–130.0215%2 Apr
dust29–13-0.0510%2 Apr
dust212–120.0426%31 Mar
anubis4–130.025%31 Mar
dust213–5-0.0324%22 Mar
dust28–130.0030%21 Mar
dust27–130.0142%19 Mar
anubis13–100.0018%19 Mar
dust213–7-0.0025%19 Mar
dust211–13-0.0119%18 Mar
ancient3–130.0426%18 Mar
nuke3–130.0235%18 Mar
ancient10–130.0522%12 Mar
dust213–80.1729%12 Mar
dust213–50.0929%11 Mar
overpass13–00.1127%10 Mar
ancient15–150.0535%8 Mar
inferno2–9-0.0027%8 Mar
dust26–70.0527%7 Mar
inferno13–30.0834%7 Mar
anubis13–50.1429%7 Mar
ancient13–60.0338%7 Mar
overpass16–130.0528%7 Mar
inferno5–130.0916%7 Mar
anubis16–130.0037%5 Mar
dust213–60.0442%5 Mar
overpass13–110.0120%5 Mar
dust213–110.0621%5 Mar
anubis10–13-0.068%1 Mar
nuke6–9-0.0538%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →