Nathan

Nathan — CS2 Stats

76561199095348623[U:1:1135082895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

123Tracked matches60%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,054Blue band · top ~44% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,054 +3,148 6 Sept – 19 Sept · 9 days played
8,90612,094peak 12,0946 Sept19 Sept
12,411Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 40 below peak (12,094)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,946 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNathanPREMIER12,054 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning63
Utility4

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 719ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility0.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 59% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.3
Utility0.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time639ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 713ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 29 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · cache, 17 Aug →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · nuke, 1 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 21cacheWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3318–1555%0.00
mirageA2213–959%0.01
nukeA2113–862%0.03
infernoB115–645%0.01
cacheC73–443%-0.01
ancient—31–233%-0.03
anubis—31–233%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
43.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
633msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.00Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
0.00HE damage / grenade
0.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–13-0.0911%19 Sept →
mirage13–50.1413%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.030%14 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.024%14 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0128%14 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0314%13 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0217%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0523%12 Sept →
dust213–50.0525%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.0725%11 Sept →
inferno3–130.0013%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0318%9 Sept →
mirage13–20.1010%9 Sept →
nuke13–90.0321%9 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.019%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0123%8 Sept →
dust216–130.0629%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0120%7 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0117%7 Sept →
ancient16–120.0423%7 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.0526%6 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0324%6 Sept →
nuke13–100.0011%6 Sept →
dust24–130.0427%6 Sept →
inferno13–80.0315%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0035%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0228%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0732%6 Sept →
mirage13–40.0515%6 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0621%6 Sept →
cache13–100.0522%6 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0419%5 Sept →
nuke13–60.0920%5 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0120%5 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0125%5 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0425%5 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0028%5 Sept →
dust213–90.0028%5 Sept →
nuke13–80.0523%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.057%3 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0610%3 Sept →
nuke10–130.1315%3 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.079%3 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0128%3 Sept →
dust28–130.0514%3 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0612%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.020%1 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0517%1 Sept →
nuke7–130.0114%1 Sept →
nuke13–20.0329%1 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0111%31 Aug →
dust24–90.0022%31 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0313%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0320%30 Aug →
nuke13–70.0325%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0426%30 Aug →
anubis4–130.0124%30 Aug →
dust213–20.099%30 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0228%30 Aug →
anubis4–130.0313%30 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0428%30 Aug →
nuke13–20.1528%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0214%29 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0114%29 Aug →
nuke13–60.1035%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.0428%26 Aug →
mirage13–90.0219%26 Aug →
inferno8–60.1324%25 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0113%25 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0713%24 Aug →
dust213–110.0026%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0122%23 Aug →
nuke13–110.0423%23 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0114%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0316%23 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0527%23 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0611%22 Aug →
dust213–20.028%22 Aug →
dust212–120.0815%22 Aug →
dust213–50.0529%21 Aug →
dust213–100.0015%20 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0112%19 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0818%19 Aug →
nuke0–50.0918%19 Aug →
dust213–110.1129%19 Aug →
mirage13–80.0230%18 Aug →
nuke6–130.0215%18 Aug →
dust213–60.1122%18 Aug →
inferno13–90.0927%18 Aug →
mirage7–5-0.0219%18 Aug →
mirage11–130.0416%18 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0813%17 Aug →
cache5–00.0140%17 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0216%17 Aug →
nuke13–30.0218%17 Aug →
dust26–13-0.1124%17 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0718%17 Aug →
nuke13–30.0828%17 Aug →
cache13–70.0130%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.