Run. — CS2 Stats

76561199093008078[U:1:1132742350]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,577Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating16,928Purple band · top ~20.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#29903 of 56580 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,356Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

428 below peak (17,356)
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,072 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning51

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWLTWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression5.9

Utility5.6

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.3

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.1

Utility5.6

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time583ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — cache 13–3

13–2Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 40% over 30

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	30	12–18	40%	-0.01
mirage	C	21	9–12	43%	-0.00
ancient	A	20	11–9	55%	0.00
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	-0.00
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	0.00
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.00
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

99Matches

49%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

69.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	11	45%	1.33	14.4
Mirage	11	36%	0.79	11.9
Ancient	7	29%	0.69	11.9
Anubis	6	67%	0.84	13.0
Inferno	4	75%	1.12	15.3
Nuke	3	0%	0.64	10.0
Overpass	2	50%	1.00	15.5
Vertigo	1	100%	0.76	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy

29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.7%Spray accuracy

80.2%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

586msReaction time

32.5%T opening success

45.9%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

8.62HE damage / grenade

8.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.4705% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–16	-0.02	29%	31 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.04	14%	30 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	18%	30 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.01	11%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	7%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.00	13%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	21%	29 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	13%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	26%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	21%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.05	11%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.06	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.03	20%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	12%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.07	19%	26 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	8%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	23%	24 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	18%	24 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.01	10%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	6%	23 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	17%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	9%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.07	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	24%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	9%	17 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.07	19%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.06	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.00	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.00	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	19%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	26%	14 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	25%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.00	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	22%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.00	16%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.05	19%	7 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.04	6%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	22%	6 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.08	19%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	29%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	16%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.03	13%	3 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	13%	3 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	19%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	24%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	12%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	15%	31 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.00	9%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.06	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	21%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	6%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	16%	26 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	10%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.05	9%	26 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	17%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.02	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	26%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	24%	20 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	26%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	13%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	12%	20 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.12	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	26%	19 Jul →