belma

belma — CS2 Stats

US76561199080088176[U:1:1119822448]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

435Tracked matches39%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.8 LearningPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+13Tracked matches · now 435
+8.5ppWin rate · 30.8% → 39.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

50Days played since 2026-02-07

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning32
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim3.5
Utility2.9
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 33% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning3.2
Utility2.9
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact1.4

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time589ms−108ms
first ⅓ avg 697ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 11 Feb
30%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 16 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 21 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 11 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7mirageWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B80413951%-0.01
infernoA74357%-0.02
mirageC73443%-0.02
ancient21150%-0.04
anubis110100%-0.02
train1010%-0.01
nuke1010%-0.03
boulder1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
64.6%Counter-strafing
12.4°Preaim
580msReaction time
17.2%T opening success
33.0%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.53HE damage / grenade
3.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3841° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.975% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3804 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.068%16 Sept
inferno13–10-0.079%16 Sept
dust25–13-0.0612%9 Sept
mirage2–13-0.048%6 Sept
anubis13–9-0.024%4 Sept
dust213–8-0.0613%4 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0210%4 Sept
dust213–20.017%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0014%3 Sept
train0–13-0.0117%3 Sept
dust212–12-0.0418%2 Sept
dust213–4-0.0111%1 Sept
dust213–11-0.1013%30 Aug
inferno13–50.136%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.036%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0710%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0711%25 Aug
dust213–8-0.0112%25 Aug
ancient11–13-0.065%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.006%20 Aug
dust24–130.0613%19 Aug
dust213–30.069%17 Aug
dust25–13-0.0530%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.110%16 Aug
dust24–13-0.0820%16 Aug
dust26–13-0.0312%15 Aug
dust213–50.0318%15 Aug
dust212–120.029%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0811%13 Aug
dust210–130.0212%13 Aug
dust210–130.0313%10 Aug
dust212–12-0.0412%9 Aug
inferno10–130.0610%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0910%9 Aug
dust213–70.046%7 Aug
dust212–120.027%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.055%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0311%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.0713%18 Jul
dust213–100.059%17 Jul
dust213–100.019%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0210%17 Jul
dust212–120.014%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.107%16 Jul
dust213–9-0.0812%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0611%15 Jul
dust213–60.027%15 Jul
dust22–1-0.060%15 Jul
inferno13–6-0.055%15 Jul
dust213–100.0712%15 Jul
dust213–11-0.096%14 Jul
dust25–130.0110%14 Jul
dust213–4-0.0512%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0114%14 Jul
dust213–90.0116%9 Jul
boulder11–13-0.037%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.0115%8 Jul
dust213–30.0614%8 Jul
dust28–13-0.0814%8 Jul
dust212–12-0.037%5 Jul
dust213–60.0517%4 Jul
dust213–100.0618%4 Jul
mirage2–13-0.005%2 Jul
dust213–80.025%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0513%1 Jul
inferno3–13-0.097%29 Jun
dust25–13-0.0510%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0415%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0415%24 Apr
dust213–7-0.0216%15 Mar
dust213–3-0.019%12 Mar
dust26–13-0.1014%8 Mar
dust29–13-0.0216%8 Mar
inferno4–13-0.084%8 Mar
dust212–12-0.0218%3 Mar
dust213–70.0016%3 Mar
dust213–20.143%3 Mar
dust213–10-0.1014%27 Feb
dust213–6-0.0110%22 Feb
dust26–13-0.0311%22 Feb
inferno8–2-0.036%21 Feb
dust213–90.0112%20 Feb
dust212–12-0.0320%20 Feb
mirage13–40.052%20 Feb
dust213–30.038%17 Feb
dust213–10-0.026%17 Feb
dust213–50.0810%17 Feb
dust213–110.015%11 Feb
dust213–10.145%11 Feb
dust212–80.0410%11 Feb
mirage13–4-0.028%11 Feb
dust26–130.025%11 Feb
dust213–6-0.047%11 Feb
dust25–13-0.025%10 Feb
dust213–7-0.0413%9 Feb
dust213–8-0.027%9 Feb
dust213–9-0.016%8 Feb
dust29–13-0.0110%8 Feb
dust25–130.0210%8 Feb
dust213–7-0.018%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →