Czorny Luzakskins.army — CS2 Stats

PL76561199076100628[U:1:1115834900]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

441Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning73

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–45–12Last 10043%Win rateTWLLLLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8

Aggression9.7

Utility4.3

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning7.3

Utility4.3

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time554ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms

Headshot accuracy22.2%+4.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.38Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–3Biggest win — overpass

4Longest win streak

5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 35% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	39	17–22	44%	0.01
mirage	C	23	8–15	35%	-0.00
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.04
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.08
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
agency	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches

56%Win rate

1.47Avg K/D

100.8ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

62%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	16	50%	1.48	20.9
Vertigo	14	86%	1.71	22.1
Nuke	10	50%	1.52	23.9
Inferno	6	67%	1.53	22.3
Anubis	4	25%	1.50	21.0
Dust2	2	100%	1.38	19.0
Ancient	2	50%	1.99	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

581msReaction time

46.8%T opening success

50.7%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

1.2%Flash assists

7.11HE damage / grenade

7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4999 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	15–15	0.06	23%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	18%	30 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	17%	30 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.05	27%	29 Aug →
cache	1–13	0.02	38%	29 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	28%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	17%	29 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.02	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	24%	24 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.08	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	37%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	26%	23 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.15	29%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	23%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	28%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.11	16%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	30%	5 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.02	30%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	17%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.10	19%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.05	23%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–7	-0.05	22%	23 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.09	24%	23 Jun →
mirage	12–16	0.05	21%	24 Feb →
nuke	13–7	0.08	21%	24 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	21%	20 Feb →
inferno	8–8	0.09	15%	20 Feb →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	23%	19 Feb →
anubis	13–10	0.03	14%	16 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	8%	12 Feb →
anubis	1–13	-0.04	12%	12 Feb →
inferno	9–4	0.21	23%	12 Feb →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	16%	1 Dec →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	15%	28 Nov →
inferno	13–4	0.03	22%	21 Nov →
inferno	4–9	-0.06	33%	21 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.01	19%	17 Nov →
inferno	5–9	-0.14	32%	17 Nov →
inferno	9–2	0.04	23%	5 Nov →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	21%	28 Oct →
inferno	4–9	-0.08	42%	28 Oct →
inferno	1–9	-0.13	36%	20 Oct →
inferno	3–9	-0.10	19%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	20%	14 Oct →
inferno	8–8	-0.03	32%	14 Oct →
inferno	9–1	0.38	38%	12 Oct →
overpass	11–13	0.07	28%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–16	0.05	19%	8 Oct →
inferno	8–8	0.01	40%	8 Oct →
inferno	8–8	0.05	16%	7 Oct →
overpass	13–9	0.03	21%	3 Oct →
inferno	5–9	-0.09	9%	1 Oct →
inferno	9–6	0.01	32%	1 Oct →
mirage	1–5	-0.11	50%	27 Sept →
inferno	9–6	0.00	28%	26 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.12	20%	26 Sept →
inferno	6–9	0.07	34%	26 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	24%	25 Sept →
ancient	12–12	0.03	27%	25 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.02	20%	21 Sept →
mirage	6–8	-0.10	47%	14 Sept →
overpass	13–6	-0.02	23%	14 Sept →
nuke	14–16	0.06	33%	29 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.05	27%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.02	11%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.08	24%	5 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.05	16%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	21%	23 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	13%	19 Jul →
overpass	15–15	0.08	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–3	0.06	17%	17 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.26	19%	17 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.08	8%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.06	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	7–9	-0.04	11%	28 Jun →
nuke	15–15	0.09	19%	26 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.05	19%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.06	25%	24 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.06	12%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.13	20%	18 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.07	30%	18 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	15%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.04	19%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.07	16%	14 Jun →
inferno	5–9	-0.09	20%	23 May →
inferno	13–5	-0.06	9%	18 May →
mirage	13–4	0.06	21%	18 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	20%	18 May →
office	6–13	0.10	18%	17 May →
office	13–5	0.06	10%	17 May →
agency	12–12	-0.05	16%	17 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	14%	17 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	22%	10 May →
inferno	13–5	0.05	16%	10 May →