Dave

Dave — CS2 Stats

FI76561199067929190[U:1:1107663462]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,242Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,586Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90690 of 221325 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,246 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 27 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,586 +3,972 15 Jun3 Sept · 13 days played
14,56819,592peak 19,59215 Jun3 Sept
19,956Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,246Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-05-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,246
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,006 below peak (19,592)
  • -769 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,972 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,414 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaveFACEITLevel 5 · 1,246 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,586 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,246csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning50
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42526Last 10042%Win rateWLLLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 706ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time640ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 8 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 8 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 30 Aug
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 23% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC27111641%-0.02
infernoD2251723%-0.01
mirageA159660%0.01
dust2C125742%0.01
ancientC114736%-0.02
anubisS86275%0.01
debris21150%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.19
eldorado110100%0.13
overpass1010%-0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

641Matches
47%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.1ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19340%1.1816.4
Nuke10352%1.2918.5
Dust29954%1.2716.8
Ancient8850%1.2016.1
Anubis7441%1.1916.0
Inferno5153%1.1915.7
Cache1741%0.9413.7
Overpass967%1.3215.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
606msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
30.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
15.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–50.1618%13 Sept
nuke9–130.0112%12 Sept
inferno7–9-0.076%10 Sept
nuke14–160.0213%8 Sept
poseidon1–9-0.1922%7 Sept
debris2–9-0.236%7 Sept
eldorado9–60.134%7 Sept
debris9–00.2814%7 Sept
nuke3–9-0.167%7 Sept
nuke9–30.1714%7 Sept
dust213–50.0717%7 Sept
inferno1–9-0.2013%6 Sept
inferno8–80.0922%6 Sept
inferno4–9-0.1116%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.078%5 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0810%5 Sept
nuke9–70.038%5 Sept
ancient10–130.008%5 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0323%4 Sept
inferno8–8-0.033%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0817%3 Sept
nuke5–90.0214%3 Sept
dust213–10-0.0120%3 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0812%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0210%31 Aug
nuke13–30.1115%30 Aug
anubis13–30.149%30 Aug
nuke2–9-0.1221%29 Aug
nuke10–13-0.069%29 Aug
anubis13–70.0010%22 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0122%17 Aug
mirage9–130.1022%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0118%16 Aug
dust214–16-0.0211%13 Aug
mirage13–40.0724%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0331%11 Aug
inferno9–70.1410%11 Aug
ancient8–13-0.1313%8 Aug
overpass2–9-0.1421%8 Aug
nuke2–9-0.1311%8 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0322%8 Aug
inferno9–00.3236%8 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0528%7 Aug
inferno6–9-0.017%7 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0921%7 Aug
nuke8–80.0415%7 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0417%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0318%27 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0110%26 Jul
nuke1–9-0.289%26 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0515%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0318%23 Jul
ancient13–40.0113%23 Jul
inferno13–30.1216%22 Jul
mirage2–13-0.054%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.019%22 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0024%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0213%21 Jul
anubis13–60.0418%21 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0116%21 Jul
dust29–130.0420%21 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0214%19 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0218%19 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0713%16 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0112%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0810%16 Jul
dust23–130.0116%16 Jul
anubis13–50.0412%16 Jul
dust213–80.0528%16 Jul
nuke13–80.0512%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.025%14 Jul
dust213–7-0.078%12 Jul
nuke9–5-0.0332%10 Jul
inferno9–130.0426%10 Jul
nuke1–13-0.047%7 Jul
dust216–14-0.0211%3 Jul
inferno13–110.0117%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0017%30 Jun
nuke13–80.0110%29 Jun
mirage13–50.109%27 Jun
inferno10–130.0912%25 Jun
ancient22–25-0.0512%24 Jun
dust23–130.0715%15 Jun
inferno3–9-0.1827%15 Jun
nuke0–9-0.2025%15 Jun
mirage13–11-0.028%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0212%14 Jun
nuke2–9-0.077%13 Jun
inferno1–9-0.1336%13 Jun
inferno7–9-0.1126%12 Jun
nuke6–9-0.1214%12 Jun
nuke9–50.0716%12 Jun
inferno8–80.0735%12 Jun
dust212–160.0412%3 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0331%3 Jun
nuke9–10.0733%3 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0823%3 Jun
mirage4–130.0018%28 May
nuke13–60.0815%28 May
ancient7–130.0610%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →