Clarence Claymøre

Clarence Claymøre — CS2 Stats

LI76561199065470423[U:1:1105204695]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,207Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating29,887Top 1% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#609 of 224054 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,207 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 26 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,887 +5,117 26 Dec16 Sept · 31 days played
24,69429,999peak 29,99926 Dec16 Sept
29,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2025-12-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 112 below peak (29,999)
  • +1,152 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 113 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClarence ClaymøreFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER29,887 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateLWLWWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +7.2pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−6.1%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 22 Feb
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–4 · overpass, 26 Jan
398msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 17 May
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2516964%0.02
mirageB21101148%0.00
overpassA159660%0.01
anubisS118373%0.05
ancientS118373%0.02
nukeD51420%0.01
inferno330100%0.07
vertigo21150%0.02
warden21150%-0.02
alpine220100%0.01
cache1010%-0.04
stronghold1010%0.03
train110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
64%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2959%1.2015.3
Anubis1464%1.1214.0
Overpass1182%1.3413.7
Vertigo580%1.3914.8
Ancient475%1.1014.8
Inferno367%1.6121.0
Nuke20%0.8218.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
572msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
15.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0317%5 Jul
overpass13–50.0337%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0116%5 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0134%4 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0923%4 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0214%29 Jun
dust213–30.0738%7 Jun
mirage5–9-0.0222%27 May
anubis12–50.0617%17 May
cache4–13-0.0427%17 May
dust21–13-0.0614%17 May
ancient0–13-0.018%13 May
ancient13–60.0015%12 May
mirage3–13-0.047%7 May
overpass13–110.0219%5 May
mirage13–110.0524%5 May
overpass13–60.0118%5 May
dust213–60.0515%5 May
dust28–130.0620%25 Apr
dust213–7-0.0335%24 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0023%24 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0021%24 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0216%23 Apr
anubis13–1-0.0022%23 Apr
overpass9–20.1223%22 Apr
overpass13–60.1318%22 Apr
dust213–7-0.0218%19 Apr
overpass13–20.0120%19 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0228%16 Apr
ancient10–130.0242%14 Apr
mirage10–130.0724%13 Apr
ancient13–100.0330%11 Apr
anubis13–40.0221%10 Apr
dust26–130.0620%8 Apr
mirage13–110.0338%7 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0129%5 Apr
anubis14–160.0318%3 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0017%3 Apr
dust213–80.0428%25 Mar
ancient13–40.0421%12 Mar
anubis13–90.0724%12 Mar
anubis13–70.1316%12 Mar
dust213–50.0225%11 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0218%10 Mar
dust29–130.0330%3 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0117%28 Feb
mirage13–20.1023%28 Feb
ancient13–40.0625%26 Feb
nuke14–160.0121%26 Feb
inferno13–30.0635%26 Feb
anubis13–70.0318%26 Feb
dust213–50.1424%22 Feb
dust29–130.0530%22 Feb
anubis13–20.1413%22 Feb
dust212–12-0.0724%22 Feb
dust213–50.0331%22 Feb
inferno9–30.0019%16 Feb
nuke5–130.0225%16 Feb
vertigo13–70.0533%16 Feb
dust213–7-0.0121%15 Feb
nuke13–110.0618%8 Feb
warden5–130.0014%8 Feb
vertigo12–12-0.0117%1 Feb
stronghold7–130.0327%1 Feb
alpine13–3-0.029%1 Feb
dust213–20.0133%1 Feb
dust29–13-0.0554%1 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0330%30 Jan
dust24–13-0.0718%30 Jan
overpass2–7-0.0533%30 Jan
inferno13–60.1436%30 Jan
mirage13–40.0719%30 Jan
dust213–40.0217%29 Jan
anubis13–40.0517%29 Jan
dust213–00.1047%29 Jan
dust213–20.1034%29 Jan
overpass0–4-0.0075%26 Jan
train13–50.0833%26 Jan
dust20–4-0.070%24 Jan
overpass7–130.0116%23 Jan
ancient13–70.0438%23 Jan
anubis12–120.0220%22 Jan
alpine13–70.0326%22 Jan
warden13–1-0.0433%22 Jan
dust213–40.0938%18 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0623%18 Jan
overpass13–7-0.0346%18 Jan
mirage13–50.0522%18 Jan
overpass7–130.0324%18 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0116%18 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0224%17 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0142%17 Jan
ancient10–13-0.0120%17 Jan
overpass2–13-0.1020%17 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0127%17 Jan
dust213–50.0130%17 Jan
ancient13–40.0228%15 Jan
dust213–110.0517%15 Jan
mirage13–100.0325%14 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0327%26 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →