Heir Apparent

Heir Apparent — CS2 Stats

76561199063108022[U:1:1102842294]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,578Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,778Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6572 of 222591 tracked
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+212Premier CS Rating · 26,566 → 26,778
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,778 +1,655 22 Aug17 Sept · 17 days played
24,45027,112peak 27,11222 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,876 +0 28 Aug2 Sept · 3 observations
1,8761,876peak 1,87628 Aug2 Sept
27,112Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,876Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,876
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 125 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 334 below peak (27,112)
  • +1,655 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,222 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeir ApparentPREMIER26,778 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,876csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning72
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57376Last 10057%Win rateWWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.6
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time556ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · vertigo, 28 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · cache, 11 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
24In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 13anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.02
dust2C2291341%0.03
cacheS1511473%0.03
nukeS1310377%0.02
vertigoA74357%0.03
anubisD72529%0.04
inferno330100%0.05
ancient21150%0.05
train110100%0.00
overpass110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

196Matches
56%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
90.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5751%1.2419.1
Dust23468%1.4120.4
Inferno2564%1.0916.5
Nuke2450%1.2218.5
Ancient2245%1.1117.2
Anubis1861%1.1316.4
Vertigo1250%0.9315.3
Train367%1.4022.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
561msReaction time
62.9%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0213%17 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0618%17 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0421%17 Sept
dust216–120.0425%17 Sept
nuke13–60.0618%16 Sept
cache13–6-0.0220%16 Sept
dust213–90.0231%16 Sept
ancient11–130.0628%16 Sept
cache13–90.0924%16 Sept
anubis9–130.0016%16 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0129%16 Sept
inferno13–100.0429%15 Sept
nuke13–50.0528%15 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0611%15 Sept
cache13–16-0.1012%14 Sept
cache13–5-0.0220%14 Sept
vertigo2–13-0.0432%14 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0219%14 Sept
cache13–50.0542%14 Sept
inferno10–10.1138%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0520%14 Sept
train13–90.0021%14 Sept
dust29–13-0.0013%13 Sept
anubis15–150.0112%13 Sept
mirage7–130.0518%13 Sept
anubis6–130.0120%12 Sept
ancient13–80.0416%11 Sept
anubis9–130.0714%11 Sept
mirage7–130.0424%11 Sept
cache8–10.0255%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0521%11 Sept
mirage0–4-0.0520%11 Sept
dust29–130.0419%11 Sept
dust28–130.0622%11 Sept
dust213–40.0225%11 Sept
mirage13–90.1121%11 Sept
mirage4–0-0.0229%11 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0215%10 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0316%9 Sept
nuke9–130.0519%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0416%8 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0116%8 Sept
dust212–120.0620%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0220%6 Sept
nuke13–70.0129%5 Sept
vertigo13–80.0117%5 Sept
cache13–50.1127%5 Sept
mirage13–90.0410%5 Sept
nuke13–60.0119%5 Sept
dust213–80.0120%5 Sept
cache11–130.0424%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.017%4 Sept
dust213–60.0725%4 Sept
cache13–90.0318%4 Sept
vertigo10–130.0430%3 Sept
overpass13–40.1130%3 Sept
mirage16–130.0220%3 Sept
cache13–60.0218%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0216%3 Sept
dust213–60.0535%3 Sept
mirage13–40.0743%2 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0322%2 Sept
dust28–130.0633%2 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0122%2 Sept
mirage6–130.0826%2 Sept
anubis13–70.0825%2 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0123%2 Sept
nuke9–130.0320%30 Aug
dust213–50.0118%30 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0022%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0520%30 Aug
cache9–130.0518%29 Aug
dust28–130.0620%29 Aug
mirage12–120.0932%29 Aug
dust213–50.0819%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0914%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0427%29 Aug
dust212–120.0523%28 Aug
vertigo13–60.1741%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0915%26 Aug
dust213–80.0120%26 Aug
anubis13–20.1118%26 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0022%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0114%25 Aug
dust29–130.0220%25 Aug
cache13–90.1019%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0210%25 Aug
cache12–120.0117%25 Aug
mirage13–50.1221%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0424%24 Aug
nuke13–90.0523%24 Aug
vertigo8–130.0719%24 Aug
dust211–130.0324%24 Aug
cache16–120.0323%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%23 Aug
mirage13–110.1321%23 Aug
dust26–130.0120%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0026%22 Aug
cache13–60.0226%22 Aug
nuke13–50.0317%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →