✪Amki?

✪Amki? — CS2 Stats

MN76561199055380607[U:1:1095114879]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,146Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,662Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9020 of 28607 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,166 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪Amki?FACEITLevel 8 · 1,166 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,662 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning48
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression6.2
Utility6.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time597ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–5
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2091145%-0.01
dust2C2081240%0.00
ancientA2012860%-0.00
anubisA1610663%-0.01
infernoD82625%-0.00
cacheB84450%-0.02
nukeC73443%0.00
debris1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

673Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
76.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20554%0.9915.1
Ancient11755%0.9915.6
Dust211349%1.0115.6
Anubis7559%1.0516.0
Inferno7344%1.0515.0
Nuke6642%0.9414.4
Cache1436%1.0815.4
Overpass838%0.9814.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
591msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
9.21HE damage / grenade
14.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7001% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0213%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0124%27 Aug
dust29–9-0.0225%27 Aug
ancient8–130.0017%27 Aug
nuke4–130.0516%27 Aug
anubis13–80.0815%26 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0518%26 Aug
inferno9–60.1024%22 Aug
cache5–130.0412%22 Aug
dust213–50.1239%20 Aug
mirage16–14-0.048%20 Aug
cache13–110.0410%19 Aug
debris3–9-0.0614%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0710%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0213%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0223%14 Aug
ancient13–10.0227%12 Aug
anubis13–80.0613%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0120%12 Aug
anubis13–40.0724%9 Aug
nuke8–130.0027%8 Aug
anubis13–70.0133%7 Aug
ancient2–13-0.039%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0022%6 Aug
dust213–50.0228%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0412%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0421%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0115%4 Aug
inferno8–80.0522%4 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0716%4 Aug
ancient13–100.0121%4 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0613%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.1126%31 Jul
anubis12–16-0.038%28 Jul
nuke13–80.0315%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.049%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0321%24 Jul
ancient11–130.0425%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0813%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0420%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0214%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0324%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0314%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0733%21 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0311%21 Jul
dust29–130.0317%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0322%20 Jul
dust24–13-0.0720%20 Jul
dust213–80.0819%19 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0313%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0126%19 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0117%19 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0711%19 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0411%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.0225%19 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0314%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0310%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0310%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.025%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0214%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0530%18 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0015%18 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0217%18 Jul
cache13–90.0016%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0313%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0513%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0318%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0328%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.019%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0324%18 Jul
dust213–70.1017%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.026%17 Jul
dust26–130.0229%17 Jul
mirage13–110.1015%17 Jul
dust213–90.0721%17 Jul
inferno8–130.0220%17 Jul
mirage6–130.0111%17 Jul
mirage9–130.0419%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.088%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0820%16 Jul
mirage12–160.0114%15 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0014%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0016%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0312%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0231%14 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0721%12 Jul
ancient13–50.0316%12 Jul
cache2–13-0.0721%12 Jul
cache13–70.0023%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0618%11 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0220%11 Jul
dust213–10.0319%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0413%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0829%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0412%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0113%9 Jul
dust214–16-0.0321%8 Jul
cache16–12-0.0316%8 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0120%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →