z1nkernagel

z1nkernagel — CS2 Stats

DE76561199051348314[U:1:1091082586]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,820Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,636Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,426Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#93548 of 258830 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,426 +1,346 6 Jul – 21 Oct · 14 days played
18,08019,979peak 19,9796 Jul21 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-07-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 553 below peak (19,979)
  • +1,254 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 574 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate55.8%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy4.7%12.0%12.4%7.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.021.03above
Match win rate44.7%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGz1nkernagelFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,426 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning57
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateWLLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.7
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time550ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 12 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · ancient, 6 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 4 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 85% over 13ancientWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2718–967%-0.01
ancientB2010–1050%0.01
cacheB168–850%-0.01
anubisB147–750%-0.00
dust2S1311–285%-0.01
inferno—41–325%-0.02
nuke—32–167%-0.04
boulder—11–0100%0.06
italy—10–10%-0.00
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,767Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
2,693Matches
44.7%Match win rate
55.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
4.7%Shot accuracy
5,457MVPs
1,100Hours (in match)
1,933Bombs planted
531Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,400dust2
1,841inferno
1,546vertigo
725nuke
388train
89cbble
55safehouse
43lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
67%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3184%1.3614.1
Ancient2959%1.0715.9
Dust21867%0.9013.8
Anubis1464%0.9311.9
Nuke875%1.2614.4
Cache683%0.9112.3
Overpass560%0.7313.6
Inferno20%0.7512.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
547msReaction time
60.6%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.90HE damage / grenade
9.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4581% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4277 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0517%28 Oct →
ancient10–130.019%28 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0320%27 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0117%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0116%27 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0221%21 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0413%21 Oct →
dust213–20.0319%21 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0510%21 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0214%19 Oct →
ancient13–20.0417%19 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.068%19 Oct →
mirage13–40.0514%18 Oct →
ancient13–80.0114%18 Oct →
cache13–6-0.022%18 Oct →
mirage13–110.0219%18 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0213%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0315%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0519%13 Oct →
dust213–10-0.007%9 Oct →
anubis13–60.0215%9 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.069%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0111%4 Oct →
mirage13–60.029%4 Oct →
cache13–00.0322%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0716%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.019%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.018%23 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0318%18 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0729%18 Sept →
dust213–50.083%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.018%16 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0819%16 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0310%15 Sept →
anubis13–60.0911%15 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0013%15 Sept →
ancient13–30.1411%12 Sept →
boulder12–50.0612%12 Sept →
italy4–13-0.0015%12 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0717%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0318%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0416%11 Sept →
anubis13–50.0110%10 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0316%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0011%9 Sept →
overpass13–40.0214%9 Sept →
cache8–130.0227%9 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0614%9 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0612%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.007%9 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0211%8 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.026%7 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0313%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0218%7 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0410%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0116%6 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0322%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0133%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0117%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0316%2 Sept →
cache13–30.0413%2 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0121%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0610%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0513%1 Sept →
cache11–130.0117%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0224%31 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.084%31 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.009%31 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0213%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0011%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0412%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0214%24 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0219%24 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0315%24 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0720%24 Aug →
anubis11–130.0612%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.009%19 Aug →
ancient13–00.006%19 Aug →
ancient8–130.017%19 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0214%17 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.028%17 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0220%17 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0513%12 Aug →
mirage6–130.0220%10 Aug →
ancient13–30.0917%10 Aug →
dust213–30.0521%10 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0622%10 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0822%10 Aug →
anubis13–110.0122%5 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0112%5 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0411%5 Aug →
mirage13–70.0220%3 Aug →
ancient13–70.0517%3 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.049%3 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0613%3 Aug →
ancient10–130.039%3 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0216%22 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0410%22 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.036%6 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.