✪ Xsist-iwnl-

✪ Xsist-iwnl- — CS2 Stats

76561199050926249[U:1:1090660521]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,457Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#19234 of 21128 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,056 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,056Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,056
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 444 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ Xsist-iwnl-FACEITLevel 9 · 2,056 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,056csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning63
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48475Last 10048%Win rateWLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression8.1
Utility6.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 2–9
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.02
dust2A169756%0.01
ancientD1651131%0.02
nukeS128467%0.02
infernoB115645%0.06
cacheC73443%0.01
anubisB63350%0.00
overpass3030%0.04
debris110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,004Matches
50%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
79.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30348%1.1616.0
Dust218753%1.2016.6
Inferno16749%1.2617.1
Ancient14253%1.2017.5
Anubis6248%1.1415.8
Nuke6055%1.2416.6
Overpass3450%1.2015.3
Vertigo2854%1.3616.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
530msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.66HE damage / grenade
18.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0311%26 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0417%26 Aug
dust213–30.0138%20 Aug
nuke13–10.0328%20 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0420%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.0217%20 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0012%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0221%20 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0318%18 Aug
dust213–20.0626%17 Aug
inferno15–150.0121%13 Aug
mirage14–160.0419%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0623%13 Aug
dust213–5-0.0130%13 Aug
mirage9–130.0022%11 Aug
ancient8–130.0025%11 Aug
mirage13–100.0724%11 Aug
ancient9–130.0131%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0216%11 Aug
inferno13–10.1623%10 Aug
ancient7–130.0126%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0420%5 Aug
nuke13–80.0917%5 Aug
mirage13–90.1127%5 Aug
dust27–130.0743%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0418%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0519%4 Aug
ancient6–130.0435%4 Aug
cache13–110.0031%3 Aug
inferno5–130.0222%1 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0212%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0130%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0521%30 Jul
debris9–40.1124%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0112%27 Jul
cache14–160.0523%25 Jul
dust219–160.0315%25 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0433%23 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0231%21 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0324%21 Jul
inferno13–80.0952%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.016%21 Jul
ancient22–200.0219%14 Jul
dust213–100.0340%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0226%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0324%12 Jul
dust213–3-0.0023%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0121%1 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0125%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0328%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0118%30 Jun
nuke1–5-0.0533%30 Jun
dust213–90.0838%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0619%30 Jun
nuke16–140.0324%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0426%28 Jun
dust213–70.0536%28 Jun
overpass7–130.0120%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0132%27 Jun
mirage7–130.0026%23 Jun
inferno16–140.0527%22 Jun
mirage13–60.1242%21 Jun
ancient11–130.0125%21 Jun
mirage12–120.1925%19 Jun
ancient5–00.0819%19 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0415%19 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0218%19 Jun
dust27–13-0.028%19 Jun
anubis13–80.1217%19 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0522%19 Jun
dust213–10-0.0115%19 Jun
mirage13–110.0221%15 Jun
dust210–13-0.0713%15 Jun
nuke13–40.1022%15 Jun
mirage7–130.0635%15 Jun
inferno13–110.1222%15 Jun
ancient10–130.0423%15 Jun
nuke6–130.0418%15 Jun
dust214–160.0735%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.079%10 Jun
cache12–120.0238%7 Jun
overpass4–130.0330%7 Jun
overpass7–130.0920%7 Jun
cache13–80.0131%22 May
ancient3–13-0.0418%30 Apr
cache9–130.0432%30 Apr
cache13–60.0030%30 Apr
inferno12–120.1030%30 Apr
nuke13–40.0426%30 Apr
mirage5–130.1134%30 Apr
mirage13–80.0227%27 Apr
dust22–13-0.0417%27 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0617%26 Apr
inferno2–90.2026%26 Apr
nuke11–40.0429%26 Apr
mirage9–10.0122%26 Apr
mirage12–120.0719%26 Apr
ancient8–130.0929%24 Apr
dust29–130.0326%23 Apr
ancient13–30.1027%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →