FISH

FISH — CS2 Stats

HK76561199050617339[U:1:1090351611]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

676Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,298Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,888Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21429 of 220490 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 676 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 29 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,888 +1,373 1 Jul15 Sept · 18 days played
19,69625,875peak 25,8751 Jul15 Sept
26,401Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 987 below peak (25,875)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,373 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 112 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate55.2%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy14.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.171.071.09above
Match win rate42.9%46.9%48.4%5.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFISHFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,888 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning37
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52444Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.5
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning3.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time631ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 23 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 23 Jul
297msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 28 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 29ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B42222052%-0.01
mirageA29181162%0.00
infernoA127558%0.02
ancientD82625%-0.02
cacheC52340%-0.02
anubis21150%-0.00
nuke2020%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,173Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2,888Matches
42.9%Match win rate
55.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,362MVPs
1,203Hours (in match)
3,673Bombs planted
650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,845
AWP7,060
FAMAS1,566
SSG 081,511
MP91,393

Lifetime map wins

9,881dust2
3,818inferno
951nuke
194vertigo
140train
81office
60cbble
27stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

141Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
69.1ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4255%1.1014.9
Dust23566%1.1215.1
Ancient2536%0.9014.4
Inferno1450%1.0014.2
Anubis1145%1.0613.9
Nuke743%1.0915.4
Cache540%0.8514.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
639msReaction time
5.0%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
4.45HE damage / grenade
9.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 5.0162% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–13-0.0230%21 Aug
dust213–50.0120%20 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0531%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0425%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0124%17 Aug
dust27–13-0.089%17 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0320%16 Aug
ancient10–130.0215%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0421%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0615%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0418%4 Aug
dust24–13-0.0521%3 Aug
dust213–100.0128%3 Aug
mirage6–130.0122%31 Jul
cache2–13-0.0814%30 Jul
dust213–6-0.0815%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.0520%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.0830%29 Jul
dust211–13-0.0023%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0235%29 Jul
mirage13–50.018%29 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0619%29 Jul
inferno13–70.0226%29 Jul
dust213–10.1237%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0323%28 Jul
cache13–8-0.0212%28 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0027%28 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0829%28 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0030%28 Jul
mirage13–5-0.028%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0635%28 Jul
dust20–13-0.040%28 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0119%27 Jul
mirage13–30.0422%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0330%27 Jul
dust213–8-0.0313%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0424%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0630%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0229%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0318%23 Jul
ancient9–130.0425%23 Jul
dust213–10.1445%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0218%22 Jul
dust216–120.0416%22 Jul
dust213–10-0.0220%22 Jul
dust213–60.0017%22 Jul
dust213–90.0317%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0219%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0424%22 Jul
mirage13–20.0925%22 Jul
dust213–5-0.0114%22 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0636%22 Jul
dust25–130.0722%15 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0020%15 Jul
dust213–80.0324%15 Jul
dust211–130.0232%15 Jul
inferno9–130.0425%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0136%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0128%15 Jul
inferno13–30.0023%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0518%14 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0419%14 Jul
mirage13–50.1123%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0517%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0421%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.1033%13 Jul
mirage13–20.042%13 Jul
dust213–70.0427%13 Jul
dust24–13-0.0511%13 Jul
anubis13–110.0416%13 Jul
dust213–8-0.0127%12 Jul
cache11–130.0129%12 Jul
dust213–60.0124%12 Jul
inferno13–60.0525%12 Jul
nuke10–130.0519%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0219%12 Jul
dust213–9-0.0120%11 Jul
dust213–80.0223%11 Jul
dust214–16-0.0118%11 Jul
dust210–130.0126%11 Jul
dust211–130.0539%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0623%11 Jul
mirage16–13-0.019%11 Jul
cache14–160.0224%11 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0729%11 Jul
dust213–80.0130%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0623%9 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0126%8 Jul
inferno13–30.1119%8 Jul
inferno0–2-0.0125%8 Jul
inferno10–130.0029%8 Jul
dust215–150.0625%2 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0614%2 Jul
mirage13–60.0413%2 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0429%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0514%2 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0027%2 Jul
dust213–110.0141%1 Jul
mirage13–60.0433%30 Jun
mirage8–130.0422%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →