saoriyu

saoriyu — CS2 Stats

BA76561199048345596[U:1:1088079868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

732Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,125Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,993Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57158 of 261507 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,993 +2,212 24 Jul – 31 Oct · 28 days played
18,83622,477peak 22,47724 Jul31 Oct
22,590Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-07-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 484 below peak (22,477)
  • +691 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,993 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,007 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.2%48.2%50.9%2.7% short
Shot accuracy18.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.261.071.09above
Match win rate47.7%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaoriyuFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,993 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning51
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 9 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–8 · dust2, 12 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 14 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
2–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 30infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3019–1163%0.02
dust2C2510–1540%0.03
cacheB137–654%0.04
ancientA138–562%0.04
infernoC114–736%0.03
anubisC52–340%0.03
nuke—21–150%-0.04
train—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,149Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
2,328Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
48.2%Headshot %
18.2%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
7,334MVPs
1,162Hours (in match)
2,919Bombs planted
495Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,730
AWP6,799
FAMAS1,085
Knife1,082
SSG 081,080

Lifetime map wins

5,811inferno
3,447dust2
789nuke
657vertigo
640train
9cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,023Matches
52%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
95.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
42%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2548%1.3818.7
Dust22157%1.3119.1
Inferno2065%1.4621.3
Ancient1567%1.1617.3
Anubis956%1.3924.4
Cache540%1.2222.0
Nuke333%1.1917.7
Vertigo367%1.2319.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
562msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
8.18HE damage / grenade
13.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6205% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0311%31 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0121%31 Oct →
ancient13–30.0716%31 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0012%25 Oct →
ancient8–130.0230%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0514%19 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0815%19 Oct →
ancient9–130.0135%18 Oct →
ancient9–130.0422%18 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0127%10 Oct →
ancient13–10.0824%10 Oct →
anubis13–20.0512%10 Oct →
dust212–160.0127%26 Sept →
mirage6–10-0.089%20 Sept →
cache4–6-0.057%20 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0412%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0020%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0436%19 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0428%19 Sept →
cache5–130.0138%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.0822%19 Sept →
ancient13–20.0611%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0322%17 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0328%17 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0729%17 Sept →
inferno7–100.1126%17 Sept →
dust213–100.0021%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0435%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0129%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.1033%9 Sept →
mirage12–120.0544%9 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0017%9 Sept →
dust213–20.0626%9 Sept →
mirage13–10.1918%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0027%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0217%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0820%6 Sept →
anubis14–160.1014%5 Sept →
mirage16–130.0116%3 Sept →
mirage13–60.0419%3 Sept →
dust28–130.0623%3 Sept →
cache13–50.0629%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0731%29 Aug →
train13–11-0.0434%29 Aug →
dust213–70.1120%29 Aug →
inferno7–130.0118%28 Aug →
ancient13–50.1216%28 Aug →
cache10–00.1533%28 Aug →
dust213–90.0819%28 Aug →
mirage7–130.0041%28 Aug →
dust213–50.1729%28 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0123%27 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0324%27 Aug →
dust26–130.0739%22 Aug →
cache10–130.1844%22 Aug →
dust213–50.0146%22 Aug →
dust20–4-0.050%22 Aug →
inferno15–150.0011%21 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0128%20 Aug →
ancient13–20.0436%19 Aug →
dust215–150.0725%19 Aug →
cache10–130.0533%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0826%14 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0523%14 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0333%14 Aug →
cache13–160.0419%12 Aug →
dust24–80.0347%12 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0516%11 Aug →
mirage10–130.0518%11 Aug →
ancient13–50.0318%11 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0332%11 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0025%11 Aug →
mirage13–60.0119%11 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0127%11 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0412%9 Aug →
cache7–10.1638%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0523%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0724%3 Aug →
dust29–13-0.038%3 Aug →
inferno9–130.0220%2 Aug →
cache13–80.0623%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0120%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0219%2 Aug →
dust24–130.0525%2 Aug →
inferno13–90.0029%2 Aug →
dust21–8-0.037%31 Jul →
mirage14–160.0725%31 Jul →
dust213–80.0426%31 Jul →
dust213–160.0417%31 Jul →
inferno13–50.0127%31 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0316%31 Jul →
anubis5–130.0233%31 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0727%31 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0536%25 Jul →
inferno13–30.1814%25 Jul →
anubis4–130.0232%25 Jul →
inferno12–160.0722%24 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0416%24 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0215%24 Jul →
dust214–160.0618%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.