TBC Mint

TBC Mint — CS2 Stats

76561199023378671[U:1:1063112943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

898Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
875Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,094Blue band · top ~33.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,526 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,094 -9,450 31 Aug – 26 Sept · 16 days played
13,62623,784peak 23,78431 Aug26 Sept
23,995Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,526Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2025-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,526
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 5 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 9,690 below peak (23,784)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 906 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.8%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy6.3%12.0%12.4%6.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.021.030.05 short
Match win rate44.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTBC MintFACEITLevel 5 · 1,526 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,094 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,526csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning66
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–58–1Last 10041%Win rateWLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−5.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 10 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · ancient, 5 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–8 · mirage, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2414–1058%-0.01
ancientC2310–1343%-0.01
infernoD154–1127%-0.03
mirageD153–1220%-0.04
overpassA74–357%0.00
anubisA53–260%-0.00
dust2—42–250%-0.01
cache—21–150%-0.00
office—20–20%0.02
alpine—10–10%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,917Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,565Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6.3%Shot accuracy
3,505MVPs
875Hours (in match)
1,456Bombs planted
489Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,017nuke
1,695inferno
1,283vertigo
676dust2
492train
60cbble
44office
36lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches
55%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6162%1.0615.5
Ancient5643%0.9414.5
Anubis4764%1.1216.4
Mirage3043%0.8713.7
Inferno2454%1.0315.3
Train1958%1.0514.9
Dust2683%1.2918.8
Overpass560%0.8713.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
544msReaction time
50.7%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
5.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4863 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0415%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0119%20 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0813%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0123%18 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.0533%18 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0412%18 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.037%18 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0513%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0224%16 Sept →
mirage0–8-0.120%16 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0223%16 Sept →
nuke9–1-0.037%16 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0025%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0720%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0429%14 Sept →
anubis13–70.0613%11 Sept →
ancient13–20.0921%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.075%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0113%11 Sept →
anubis16–140.0117%11 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1010%11 Sept →
nuke13–10.0112%11 Sept →
nuke9–130.0011%11 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0012%11 Sept →
inferno13–30.0419%10 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0818%10 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0416%10 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0114%10 Sept →
nuke13–20.0224%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.1016%10 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0521%10 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0511%9 Sept →
inferno7–130.0215%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0120%7 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.028%7 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0433%5 Sept →
anubis13–160.0010%4 Sept →
nuke13–30.0019%26 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.1127%26 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0911%20 Jun →
inferno1–13-0.1220%20 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0730%19 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0019%19 Jun →
alpine11–13-0.0220%14 Apr →
office8–130.0713%14 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0313%14 Apr →
overpass13–70.0229%8 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0523%8 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0112%8 Apr →
ancient13–110.0720%30 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.068%29 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0117%24 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0112%24 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0725%6 Nov →
nuke13–100.0413%4 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0115%4 Nov →
nuke13–100.0124%2 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0417%28 Oct →
overpass13–110.0011%3 Oct →
nuke13–160.0318%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0323%27 Sept →
overpass6–130.0723%27 Sept →
train1–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0611%26 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0312%26 Sept →
ancient13–60.0414%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0617%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.019%23 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0116%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0818%6 Sept →
office11–13-0.0335%5 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0629%5 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0212%5 Sept →
ancient7–130.0525%5 Sept →
overpass3–13-0.0222%5 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0610%5 Sept →
ancient3–00.08100%5 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0313%5 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0310%5 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0414%5 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0450%3 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.068%3 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0020%3 Sept →
inferno9–130.0216%3 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0423%3 Sept →
overpass13–9-0.0120%1 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0129%1 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.1015%1 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0213%1 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0121%31 Aug →
mirage13–30.0710%31 Aug →
nuke13–00.0523%31 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0423%31 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.039%31 Aug →
ancient13–40.0021%31 Aug →
overpass13–90.0226%31 Aug →
vertigo1–130.0133%29 Aug →
ancient3–130.0021%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0118%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.