Boofy THEREALCOW

Boofy THEREALCOW — CS2 Stats

76561199020434178[U:1:1060168450]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

813Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,236Top 5% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4734 of 241062 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 813 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 28 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,236 +963 1 Jul24 Sept · 15 days played
25,61327,558peak 27,5581 Jul24 Sept
27,558Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-06-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 322 below peak (27,558)
  • +201 over 30 days · steady
  • +963 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,764 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoofy THEREALCOWFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER27,236 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning56
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT66295Last 10066%Win rateWWWWWLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 811 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 45% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time492ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 8 Aug
53%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 1 Jul
313msFastest reaction time · 6–0 · mirage, 15 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3021970%0.03
infernoA159660%0.03
ancientS1510567%0.01
nukeS129375%0.03
anubisA95456%-0.00
cacheS75271%0.02
dust2D62433%0.01
vertigo32167%0.05
overpass220100%0.07
train110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
62%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
71.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2100%0.7111.0
Ancient10%0.9415.0
Mirage1100%1.8220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
502msReaction time
44.7%T opening success
25.8%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3776 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.8406% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–30.0023%19 Sept
vertigo13–60.1219%19 Sept
ancient13–50.1227%19 Sept
vertigo13–40.0441%19 Sept
nuke13–40.0130%19 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0510%6 Sept
inferno8–10.1028%6 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0119%6 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0233%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0228%6 Sept
ancient10–130.0319%5 Sept
vertigo5–13-0.0129%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0621%5 Sept
mirage4–9-0.0513%5 Sept
dust213–00.0542%30 Aug
dust29–13-0.0111%30 Aug
anubis13–80.026%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0427%22 Aug
ancient15–150.0240%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0114%22 Aug
cache5–130.0121%22 Aug
anubis16–130.0127%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0320%20 Aug
anubis2–8-0.0627%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0510%20 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0127%15 Aug
cache13–70.0421%15 Aug
anubis13–40.0713%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0113%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0438%15 Aug
ancient13–20.0119%12 Aug
nuke13–80.0325%12 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0022%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0323%12 Aug
nuke13–60.0334%12 Aug
mirage13–40.029%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0023%9 Aug
inferno13–70.0536%9 Aug
inferno13–40.0819%9 Aug
inferno12–120.0224%8 Aug
mirage13–10.0124%8 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0217%8 Aug
overpass13–70.0429%8 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0710%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0121%8 Aug
mirage13–00.2432%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0725%8 Aug
dust23–5-0.0729%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0227%26 Jul
mirage0–40.0250%21 Jul
cache13–10.0726%21 Jul
mirage13–60.0118%21 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0718%21 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0415%21 Jul
anubis13–80.1050%21 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0133%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0830%21 Jul
inferno10–40.0532%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0418%21 Jul
inferno9–130.0229%21 Jul
mirage13–40.0423%18 Jul
nuke10–130.0121%15 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0119%15 Jul
cache16–14-0.0128%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0217%15 Jul
cache6–130.0422%15 Jul
mirage13–30.1021%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0318%15 Jul
nuke13–00.1027%15 Jul
mirage6–00.0140%15 Jul
ancient11–130.0214%15 Jul
inferno13–20.0830%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0726%11 Jul
dust213–110.0921%11 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0633%11 Jul
mirage7–130.1027%8 Jul
inferno10–130.0423%8 Jul
mirage8–130.0121%3 Jul
mirage13–10.0424%3 Jul
ancient13–110.0920%3 Jul
mirage12–00.0227%3 Jul
nuke2–130.0413%3 Jul
cache13–8-0.0321%3 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0325%1 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0217%1 Jul
mirage13–60.0825%1 Jul
overpass13–30.1122%1 Jul
nuke13–40.0238%1 Jul
ancient13–90.0210%1 Jul
dust23–130.0153%1 Jul
cache13–30.0518%1 Jul
nuke10–130.047%30 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0010%30 Jun
nuke13–80.0922%30 Jun
ancient13–50.0248%28 Jun
train13–20.1130%28 Jun
nuke13–50.0120%28 Jun
mirage13–60.0317%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0115%28 Jun
mirage13–30.0025%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →