Joe — CS2 Stats
76561199018268338[U:1:1058002610]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 12 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- 5,723 below peak (15,185)
- -4,676 over 30 days · declining
- Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 538 to go
- Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction
Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 2–3 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating -0.02
- Avg headshot accuracy 9%
- Avg reaction 676ms
Last 10
- 4–6 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating -0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 11%
- Avg reaction 651ms
Last 20
- 9–11 · 45% win rate
- Avg rating -0.03
- Avg headshot accuracy 13%
- Avg reaction 623ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like jL 64% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 2.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 cache | B | 53 | 27–26 | 51% | -0.01 |
 mirage | B | 23 | 11–12 | 48% | -0.02 |
 nuke | B | 8 | 4–4 | 50% | -0.02 |
 inferno | C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.03 |
 ancient | — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.05 |
 dust2 | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.05 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
| italy | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.09 |
| fachwerk | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced MechanicsAim Training →
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.6363° — above the 12° mark we flag
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.3746% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4393 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 9–13 | -0.00 | 10% | 15 Sept → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 9 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.01 | 0% | 7 Sept → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.04 | 9% | 7 Sept → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 6 Sept → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 6 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.03 | 11% | 4 Sept → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.09 | 11% | 4 Sept → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 4 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.05 | 20% | 4 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–5 | -0.01 | 26% | 4 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.07 | 0% | 3 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.00 | 18% | 3 Sept → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 3 Sept → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.00 | 6% | 1 Sept → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 1 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–9 | -0.05 | 14% | 1 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.03 | 11% | 31 Aug → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 31 Aug → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.10 | 15% | 27 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.04 | 29% | 26 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.04 | 10% | 26 Aug → | |
| mirage | 12–16 | -0.02 | 15% | 23 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | -0.00 | 16% | 23 Aug → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.09 | 10% | 21 Aug → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | -0.09 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.04 | 12% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–8 | -0.03 | 6% | 19 Aug → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.11 | 10% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.07 | 18% | 19 Aug → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 17 Aug → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.05 | 10% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.01 | 21% | 17 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.00 | 11% | 17 Aug → | |
| cache | 12–16 | -0.03 | 11% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.01 | 10% | 13 Aug → | |
| inferno | 2–13 | -0.05 | 7% | 11 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.05 | 6% | 10 Aug → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | 0.01 | 11% | 10 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–2 | 0.05 | 15% | 10 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.04 | 11% | 9 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.01 | 15% | 6 Aug → | |
| inferno | 12–12 | -0.04 | 11% | 30 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 5–1 | -0.08 | 0% | 30 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.04 | 14% | 30 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.01 | 4% | 30 Jul → | |
| cache | 6–13 | -0.05 | 0% | 30 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.02 | 8% | 30 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–4 | -0.06 | 12% | 28 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | -0.06 | 7% | 28 Jul → | |
| italy | 9–13 | -0.09 | 38% | 27 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.00 | 11% | 27 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.01 | 4% | 27 Jul → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.04 | 31% | 23 Jul → | |
| fachwerk | 13–9 | -0.03 | 7% | 22 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.00 | 8% | 22 Jul → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 15 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.00 | 12% | 13 Jul → | |
| cache | 10–13 | 0.02 | 10% | 2 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.02 | 11% | 29 Jun → | |
| cache | 6–13 | -0.08 | 9% | 29 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.09 | 11% | 28 Jun → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 26 Jun → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 23 Jun → | |
| cache | 3–13 | 0.01 | 2% | 22 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.05 | 16% | 22 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.05 | 14% | 19 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.02 | 5% | 17 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.04 | 12% | 17 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.17 | 19% | 17 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.05 | 7% | 16 Jun → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.03 | 7% | 5 Jun → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 5 Jun → | |
| cache | 10–13 | 0.04 | 6% | 2 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.06 | 16% | 31 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.07 | 27% | 31 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.04 | 7% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 30 May → | |
| cache | 8–13 | 0.07 | 14% | 29 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.04 | 13% | 29 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.03 | 9% | 29 May → | |
| cache | 13–9 | -0.03 | 8% | 28 May → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 26 May → | |
| cache | 2–13 | 0.06 | 6% | 25 May → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.02 | 9% | 25 May → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.09 | 22% | 24 May → | |
| cache | 3–0 | 0.00 | 0% | 24 May → | |
| cache | 10–3 | 0.02 | 8% | 23 May → | |
| cache | 6–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 23 May → | |
| cache | 3–13 | -0.10 | 6% | 22 May → | |
| cache | 0–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 22 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.11 | 10% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 3–9 | -0.09 | 0% | 18 May → | |
| cache | 3–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 14 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.02 | 9% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 11–13 | -0.07 | 12% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.11 | 2% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.04 | 13% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.05 | 4% | 13 May → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.08 | 7% | 12 May → |
Match data via Leetify.
