<!TAISTELUKANA!>

<!TAISTELUKANA!> — CS2 Stats

76561199016190653[U:1:1055924925]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

574Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 5 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,627 +556 5 Feb27 Apr · 18 days played
12,07115,645peak 15,6455 Feb27 Apr
15,645Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-02-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG<!TAISTELUKANA!>FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning50
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44497Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −123ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact1.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · office, 3 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–5 · dust2, 31 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · office, 11 Sept
13–2Biggest win · italy, 8 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC25111444%0.03
dust2D2051525%-0.01
ancientB179853%0.03
anubisD103730%-0.02
mirageC94544%-0.02
infernoS97278%0.04
nuke32167%0.01
vertigo2020%-0.03
cache220100%0.07
train2020%0.00
italy110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
34%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
89.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2714%1.0915.3
Ancient667%1.2013.0
Inferno540%1.3819.0
Mirage367%1.2017.3
Anubis333%0.9816.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.5%Spray accuracy
68.4%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
575msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
8.46HE damage / grenade
9.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6283% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.293% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–11-0.0311%18 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0410%17 Sept
office6–13-0.056%17 Sept
office3–13-0.098%14 Sept
office13–30.0617%12 Sept
office13–90.0414%11 Sept
office13–60.0716%10 Sept
ancient10–130.0917%9 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0812%8 Sept
office13–90.0714%6 Sept
office13–80.1114%4 Sept
dust23–5-0.0450%31 Aug
office12–120.0310%30 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0216%30 Aug
office12–120.033%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0422%28 Aug
dust25–12-0.0713%19 Aug
office9–130.038%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0111%12 Aug
vertigo7–10-0.016%8 Aug
dust213–16-0.0412%8 Aug
cache13–50.1014%8 Aug
italy13–20.169%8 Aug
train12–120.038%7 Aug
dust23–130.0822%7 Aug
office1–13-0.086%7 Aug
train12–12-0.0317%6 Aug
inferno3–130.1417%6 Aug
nuke10–13-0.027%6 Aug
office13–80.0419%4 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0416%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0311%4 Aug
cache13–20.0314%4 Aug
office12–120.0211%3 Aug
office13–20.2116%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0018%27 Jul
inferno13–30.0720%27 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0013%25 Jul
office13–60.0919%24 Jul
dust29–13-0.0123%24 Jul
ancient13–50.0215%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0210%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0512%23 Jul
inferno7–00.0325%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0328%22 Jul
ancient14–160.047%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0612%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0217%21 Jul
mirage13–110.008%21 Jul
office5–130.0114%26 Jun
ancient13–80.0710%27 Apr
office12–120.0227%23 Apr
inferno13–70.0418%18 Apr
office4–90.075%24 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0113%13 Mar
mirage8–13-0.058%11 Mar
ancient6–130.0514%11 Mar
anubis9–130.0518%7 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0514%7 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0615%26 Feb
dust211–13-0.0419%26 Feb
office9–130.0413%26 Feb
office7–13-0.073%25 Feb
office5–13-0.0217%23 Feb
office13–70.028%21 Feb
ancient13–100.029%21 Feb
inferno13–70.029%20 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0112%17 Feb
dust27–130.0312%17 Feb
ancient11–130.0610%15 Feb
mirage13–80.0321%15 Feb
ancient13–90.1210%15 Feb
dust213–80.0116%15 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0211%14 Feb
dust213–50.0621%13 Feb
nuke13–50.0416%13 Feb
anubis13–8-0.059%13 Feb
office8–13-0.048%12 Feb
dust27–130.0114%12 Feb
ancient13–90.0813%12 Feb
ancient15–150.016%12 Feb
anubis9–130.0318%11 Feb
dust28–130.0114%11 Feb
ancient13–40.0413%10 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0014%10 Feb
anubis7–13-0.038%10 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0411%10 Feb
dust213–11-0.0025%9 Feb
inferno16–120.0312%9 Feb
inferno13–60.1211%8 Feb
dust21–8-0.0513%8 Feb
dust213–110.0722%8 Feb
mirage13–60.0016%8 Feb
nuke13–80.0318%7 Feb
dust25–13-0.0414%7 Feb
ancient16–12-0.045%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0113%6 Feb
office13–110.0814%6 Feb
dust213–90.0115%5 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0410%5 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →